Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:07:20.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review Article

Review products

BruceHayes (1995)Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Pp. xv +455

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

René Kager
René Kager
Affiliation:
University of Utrecht
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Phonology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , December 1995 , pp. 437 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bloomfield, Leonard (1962). The Menomini language. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Thaddeus L. (1894). Rhythm. American Journal of Psychology 6. 145–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, Sylvia M. (1964). The Southern Sierra Miwok language. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1988). English stressGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M.Loporcaro, M. (eds.) Certamen Phonologicum: papers from the 1987 Cortona Phonology Meeting. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier. 153–175.Google Scholar
Churchward, C. Maxwell (1953). Tongangrammar. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart M. (1988). Syllable onsets as a factor in stress rules. Phonology 5. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan & Aditi, Lahiri (1991). The Germanic foot: metrical coherence in Old English. LI 22. 251–286Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. & Everett, Karen (1984). Syllable onsets and stress placements in Piraha. WCCFL 3. 105–116Google Scholar
Freeland, Lucy S. (1951). Language of the Sierra Miwok. Bloomington: Indiana UniversityGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz (1985). Metrical phonology and phonological structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Idsardi, William (1995). Stress and metrical structure. In John A., Goldsmith (ed.) The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 403–443.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Michael (1984). Constraining metrical theory: a modular theory of rhythm and destressing. PhD dissertation, UCLAGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1980). A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, MITGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1984). The phonology of rhythm in English. LI 15. 33–74.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1985). Iambic and trochaic rhythm in stress rules. BLS 13. 429–446.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1987). A revised parametric metrical theory. NELS 17 274–289.Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry vander (1984). Syllable structure and stress in Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, Henrietta (1994). The rhythmic and prosodic organization of edge constituents. PhD dissertation, Brandeis UniversityGoogle Scholar
Kager, Rene (1989). A metrical theory of stress and destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar
Kager, Rene (1992). Shapes of the generalized trochee. WCCFL 11. 298–311.Google Scholar
Kager, Rene (1993). Alternatives to the iambic-trochaic law. NLLT 11. 381–432.Google Scholar
Kager, Rene (1995). Consequences of catalexis. In H. van der Hulst & J. van de Weijer (eds.) Leiden in last. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics. 269–298Google Scholar
Kager, Rene & Visch, Ellis (1988). Metrical constituency and rhythmic adjustment. Phonology 5. 21–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyser, Samuel J. & Kiparsky, Paul (1984). Syllable structure in Finnish phonology. In M. Aronoff & R., Oehrle (eds.) Language sound structure. Cambridge,Mass.: MIT Press. 2–31.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1991). Catalexis. Ms, Stanford University & Wissenschaftskolleg zu BerlinGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark (1975). The intonational system of English. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Alan, Prince (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LI 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan (1986). Prosodic morphology. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Brandeis UniversityGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan (1993). Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Rutgers UniversityGoogle Scholar
Mester, Armin (1994). The quantitative trochee in Latin. NLLT 12. 1–61.Google Scholar
Moulton, W. G. (1962). The vowels of Dutch: phonetic and distributional classes. Lingua 11. 294–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth (1964). Stress trains in Auca. In D. Abercrombie, D. B. Fry, P. A. D. MacCarthy, N. C. Scott &J. L. M.Trim (eds.) In honour of Daniel Jones. London: Longman. 425431.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (1980). A metrical theory for Estonian quantity. LI 11. 511–562.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (1983). Relating to the grid. LI 14. 19–100.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (1992). Quantitative consequences of rhythmic organization. CLS 26 355–398.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. To appear, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1991). Moras and others slots. Proceedings of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica, 1. 254–280Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard (1992). CVC light syllables, geminates and Moraic Theory. Phonology 8. 291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trommelen, Mieke T. G. (1983). The syllable in Dutch, with special reference to diminutive formation. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar
Woodrow, Herbert (1909). A quantitative study of rhythm. Archives of Psychology (New York)14. 1–66.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (1992). On quantity-insensitive languages. Ms, University of California at IrvineGoogle Scholar