Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:21:49.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polish stress: looking for phonetic evidence of a bidirectional system*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2012

Luiza Newlin-Łukowicz
Luiza Newlin-Łukowicz
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports on a study of Polish stress, the only uncontested example of a bidirectional system with internal lapses (Kager 2001, McCarthy 2003). The results indicate that Polish stress is non-iterative, a finding that seriously calls into question the existence of this particular stress type. An analysis of the acoustic prominence of syllables traditionally associated with different stress levels suggests that Polish simple words exhibit only one (penultimate) prominence. The stress pattern in compounds is less uniform; they can carry one or two (penultimate) stresses, depending on their prosodic structure. I analyse the distribution of stresses in compounds as governed by clash avoidance. Specifically, compound stems are parsed into separate PWds and assigned separate stresses only if the emergent trochees are non-adjacent. Hence, four-syllable compounds like /tsuʤɔ-ˈʑεmʲεts/ ‘foreigner’ have one stress, while compounds like /banaˈnɔvɔ-arbuˈzɔvɨ/ ‘banana-watermelon’ have two. I ascribe this pattern to the undominated ranking of the *FtFt constraint.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , August 2012 , pp. 271 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adisasmito-Smith, Niken & Cohn, Abigail C. (1996). Phonetic correlates of primary and secondary stress in Indonesian: a preliminary study. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 11. 1–16.Google Scholar
Alber, Birgit (2005). Clash, Lapse and Directionality. NLLT 23. 485–542.Google Scholar
Alderete, John (1999). Morphologically governed accent in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Arantes, Pablo & Barbosa, Plínio A. (2008). F1 and spectral correlates of secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Speech Prosody. Campinas, Brazil. 559–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awedyk, Wiesław (1986). Perception of stressed syllables in natural stimuli: a contrastive English-Polish experimental study. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 21. 41–45.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D. M. & Maechler, Martin (2009). Package ‘lme4’ (Version 0.999375-42): linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Available (July 2012) at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Edwards, Jan (1994). Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In Keating, Patricia A. (ed.) Phonological structure and phonetic form: papers in laboratory phonology III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7–33.Google Scholar
Benni, Tytus (1914). O akcencie polskim, spostrzeżenia i pomiary. Sprawozdania z Posiedzeń Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego 7:6.Google Scholar
Blaho, Sylvia & Szeredi, Daniel (2011). Secondary stress in Hungarian: (morpho)-syntactic, not metrical. WCCFL 28. 51–59.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2010). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.20). http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. (1964). Intonation as a universal. In Lunt, Horace G. (ed.) Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton. 833–848.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani, Kaun, Abigail, Narayanan, Shrikanth & Saltzman, Eliot (2000). Phrasal signatures in articulation. In Broe, Michael B. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology V: acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 70–87.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. & 't Hart, J. (1967). On the anatomy of intonation. Lingua 19. 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Abigail C. (1989). Stress in Indonesian and bracketing paradoxes. NLLT 7. 167–216.Google Scholar
Cooper, William E. & Paccia-Cooper, Jeanne (1980). Syntax and speech. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, Kenneth J. (1991). The oral articulation of English stress accent. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Díaz-Campos, Manuel (2000). The phonetic manifestation of secondary stress in Spanish. In Campos, Héctor, Herburger, Elena, Morales-Front, Alfonso & Walsh, Thomas J. (eds.) Hispanic linguistics at the turn of the millennium: papers from the 3rd Hispanic linguistics symposium. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla. 49–65.Google Scholar
Dłuska, Maria (1932). Rytm spółgłoskowy polskich grup akcentowych. Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności.Google Scholar
Dłuska, Maria (1950). Fonetyka polska. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Dłuska, Maria (1957). Akcent i atona w języku polskim. Studia z Filologii Polskiej i Słowiańskiej 2. 92–121.Google Scholar
Dłuska, Maria (1974). Prozodia języka polskiego. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Dogil, Grzegorz & Williams, Briony (1999). The phonetic manifestation of word stress. In van der Hulst (1999). 273–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, Emmanuel, Pallier, Christophe, Sebastián, Núria & Mehler, Jacques (1997). A destressing ‘deafness’ in French? Journal of Memory and Language 36. 406–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eek, Arvo (1982). Stress and associated phenomena: a survey with examples from Estonian I. Estonian Papers in Phonetics 1980–1. 20–58.Google Scholar
Elenbaas, Nine & Kager, René (1999). Ternary rhythm and the lapse constraint. Phonology 16. 273–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks, Grant, House, Arthur S. & Stevens, Eugene L. (1950). An experimental study of vowel intensities. JASA 22. 457–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fear, Beverley D., Cutler, Anne & Butterfield, Sally (1995). The strong/weak syllable distinction in English. JASA 97. 1893–1904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzgerald, Colleen M. (2001). The morpheme-to-stress principle in Tohono O'odham. Linguistics 39. 941–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, Steven (1985). Extrametricality and stress in Polish. LI 16. 144–151.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. JASA 27. 765–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furby, Christine (1974). Garawa phonology. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Garnier, Maëva, Dohen, Marion, Lœvenbruck, Hélène, Welby, Pauline & Bailly, Lucie (2006). The Lombard Effect: a physiological reflex or a controlled intelligibility enhancement? In Yehia, Hani Camille, Demolin, Didier & Laboissiere, Rafael (eds.) Proceedings of ISSP 2006: 7th International Seminar on Speech Production. 225–262.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (1995). Acoustic properties of primary and secondary word-level stress in Estonian. Poster presented at 130th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, St Louis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (1997). Phonetic correlates of stress and the prosodic hierarchy in Estonian. In Lehiste, Ilse & Ross, Jaan (eds.) Estonian prosody: papers from a symposium. Tallinn: Institute of Estonian Language. 100–124.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (2002). A factorial typology of quantity-insensitive stress. NLLT 20. 491–552.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (2004). A phonological and phonetic study of word-level stress in Chickasaw. International Journal of American Linguistics 70. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Rose, Françoise (2006). Émérillon stress: a phonetic and phonological study. Anthropological Linguistics 48. 132–168.Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria (2010). The phonology of boundaries and secondary stress in Russian compounds. The Linguistic Review 27. 387–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouskova, Maria & Roon, Kevin (2009). Interface constraints and frequency in Russian compound stress. In Babyonyshev, Maria, Kavitskaya, Darya & Reich, Jodi (eds.) Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: the Yale Meeting 2008. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. 49–63.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Gerald R. (1986). Stress in Polish compounds. Lingua 70. 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussmann, Edmund (2007). The phonology of Polish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1984). Grids and trees. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Hammond, Michael (1989). Lexical stresses in Macedonian and Polish. Phonology 6. 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, James W. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: a nonlinear analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Johan 't (1981). Differential sensitivity to pitch distance, particularly in speech. JASA 69. 811–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heuven, Vincent J. van (1987). Stress patterns in Dutch (compound) adjectives: acoustic measurements and perception data. Phonetica 44. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hintz, Diane M. (2006). Stress in South Conchucos Quechua: a phonetic and phonological study. International Journal of American Linguistics 72. 477–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Arthur S. & Fairbanks, Grant (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. JASA 25. 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio (2010). Secondary stress and stress clash in Spanish. In Ortega-Llebaria, Marta (ed.) Selected Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla. 11–19.Google Scholar
Harry van der, Hulst (ed.) (1999). Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hyde, Brett (2008). Bidirectional stress systems. WCCFL 26. 270–278.Google Scholar
Idsardi, William & Poeppel, David (2012). Neurophysiological techniques in laboratory phonology. In Cohn, Abigail C., Fougeron, Cécile & Huffman, Marie K. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 593–605.Google Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor (1959). The phonology of Polish stress. Word 15. 252–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor (1962). Akcent języka polskiego. Wrocław: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor, Morton, John & Steffen-Batog, Maria (1968). The perception of stress in synthetic speech-like stimuli by Polish listeners. In Jassem, Wiktor (ed.) Speech analysis and synthesis. Vol. 1. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. 289–308.Google Scholar
Kager, René (1993). Alternatives to the iambic-trochaic law. NLLT 11. 381–432.Google Scholar
Kager, René (1994). Ternary rhythm in alignment theory. Ms, Utrecht University. Available as ROA-35 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Kager, René (2001). Rhythmic directionality by positional licensing. Handout of paper presented at the 5th Holland Institute of Linguistics Phonology Conference, Potsdam. Available as ROA-514 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. (1974). The duration of [s] in English words. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 17. 51–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klatt, Dennis H. (1975). Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. JPh 3. 129–140.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. JASA 59. 1208–1221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona (2003). The phonology of stress in Polish. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (1984). Declination: a review and some hypotheses. Phonology Yearbook 1. 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse (1966). Consonant quantity and phonological units in Estonian. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse (1973). Rhythmic units and syntactic units in production and perception. JASA 54. 1228–1234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, M. Paul (ed.) (2009). Ethnologue: languages of the world. 16th edn. Dallas: SIL International. Available at http://www.ethnologue.com.Google Scholar
Lynch, John (1978). A grammar of Lenakel. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Łukaszewicz, Beata & Rozborski, Bogdan (2008). Korelaty akustyczne akcentu wyrazowego w języku polskim dorosłych i dzieci. Prace Filologiczne 54. 265–283.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2003). OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20. 75–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1993). Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993. 79–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeda, Shinji (1974). A characterization of fundamental frequency contours of speech. Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics 114. 193–210.Google Scholar
Matteson, Esther (1965). The Piro (Arawakan) language. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mattys, Sven L. (2000). The perception of primary and secondary stress in English. Perception and Psychophysics 62. 253–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrill Adams, Tuuli (2007). Phonetic cues identifying English compounds. In Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Saarbrücken: Saarland University. 1001–1004.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina (1999). Stress domains. In van der Hulst (1999). 273–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Francis (2003). Intonational equivalence: an experimental evaluation of pitch scales. In Solé, M. J., Recasens, D. & Romero, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: Causal Productions. 771–774.Google Scholar
Okobi, Anthony (2006). Acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Oller, D. Kimbrough (1973). The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. JASA 54. 1235–1247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peperkamp, Sharon & Dupoux, Emmanuel (2002). A typological study of stress ‘deafness’. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.) Laboratory phonology 7. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 203–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E. & Lehiste, Ilse (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. JASA 32. 693–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo, Kunter, Gero & Schramm, Mareile (2011). Acoustic correlates of primary and secondary stress in North American English. JPh 39. 362–374.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar & van Santen, Jan (1996). Secondary stress in Spanish: some experimental evidence. In Parodi, Claudia, Quicoli, Carlos, Saltarelli, Mario & Zubizarreta, María Luisa (eds.) Aspects of Romance linguistics: selected papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 337–356.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (1983). Relating to the grid. LI 14. 19–100.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2011). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.r-project.org.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy & Booij, Geert (1985). A grid theory of stress in Polish. Lingua 66. 281–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluijter, Agaath M. C. & van Heuven, Vincent J. (1996). Acoustic correlates of linguistic stress and accent in Dutch and American English. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP). Vol. 2. 630–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffen-Batogowa, Maria (2000). Struktura akcentowa języka polskiego. Warsaw & Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Trouvain, Jürgen, Barry, William J., Nielsen, Claus & Andersen, Ove (1998). Implications of energy declination for speech synthesis. Proceedings of the ESCA/COCOSDA Workshop on Speech Synthesis. Jenolan Caves House, Australia. 47–52.Google Scholar
Turk, Alice E. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie (2000). Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English. JPh 28. 397–440.Google Scholar
Whalen, D. H. & Levitt, Andrea G. (1995). The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. JPh 23. 349–366.Google Scholar
Wightman, Colin W., Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie, Ostendorf, Mari & Price, Patti J. (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. JASA 91. 1707–1717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Luiza Newlin-Łukowicz

Supplementary data

Download Luiza Newlin-Łukowicz(File)
File 5.3 MB