Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:34:22.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The phonology of the velar glide in Axininca Campa*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

H. Andrew Black
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz and Summer Institute of Linguistics

Extract

Three important strands of research characterise modern phonological theory; (i) the cyclic interaction of morphology and phonology; (ii) prosodic structure as it is built from segments into moras, syllables, feet and ultimately the phonological word; and (iii) the precise internal structure of segments, including feature geometry, how these features may reside on autosegmental tiers, and how they may be underspecified.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archangeli, Diana (1984). Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Black, Andy (1989). Onset insertion in Axininca Campa. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1986). Inalterability in CV phonology. Lg 62. 321351.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1987). A revised parametric metrical theory. NELS 17. 274289.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. LI 20. 253306.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko (1986). Syllable theory in prosodic structure. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko (1989). A prosodic theory of epenthesis. NLLT 7. 217259.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M. & Shaw, Patricia A. (1985). On the theory of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 130.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In Yang, I.-S. (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 391.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1984). On the lexical phonology of Icelandic. In Elert, C. C., Johansson, I. & Strangert, E. (eds.) Nordic Prosody III. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. 135164.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Prince, Alan (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LI 8. 249336.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 43. 84108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan S. (1989). Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Brandeis University.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan S. (1990). Foot and word in prosodic morphology: the Arabic broken plural. NLLT 8. 209283.Google Scholar
Mester, R. Armin & Itô, Junko (1989). Feature predictability and underspecification: palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics. Lg 65. 258293.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1986). The theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Payne, David L. (1981). The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa. University of Texas at Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics Publications in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Payne, David L., Payne, Judith K. & Santos, Jorge Sanchez (1982). Morfología, fonología, y fonetica del ashéninca del Apurucayali (campa-arawak preandino). Pucallpa, Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (forthcoming). Quantitative consequences of rhythmic organization.CLS 26.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (1988). A two-root theory of length. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Spring, Can (1990). Implications of Axininca Campa for prosodic morphology and reduplication. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Karina (1988). Prosodic structure and Lardil phonology. LI 19. 325334.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (1983). Some problems of syllable structure in Axininca Campa. NELS 13. 243251.Google Scholar