Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:16:39.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonological implications of skeleton and feature underspecification in Kasem*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Wim G. de Haas
Wim G. de Haas
Affiliation:
University of Nijmegen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The West African language Kasem, which is spoken by the Kasenas on both sides of the northern border between Ghana and Burkina Faso, figured prominently in the abstractness controversy in the late seventies. The analyses proposed by Halle (1978) and Phelps (1975, 1979), in particular, show most clearly that the framework of linear phonology does not provide a suitable model for the description of the complex set of alternations that can be observed in the nominal system of this language. I will argue that the theory of underspecification (cf. Kiparsky 1982, 1985; Archangeli 1984; among others) together with the principles of CV phonology (cf. McCarthy 1979, 1981; Clements & Keyser 1983; Levin 1985) provide the necessary equipment to account for the Kasem facts in a relatively simple and insightful way. It will turn out that these subtheories enable us to collapse several seemingly independent processes into a rather small set of language-specific rules.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , August 1988 , pp. 237 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archangeli, Diana (1984). Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana & Pulleyblank, Douglas (forthcoming). The content and structure of phonological representations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Callow, John C. (1965a). Collected field reports on the phonology of Kasem. Institute of African Studies, University of Ghana.Google Scholar
Callow, John C. (1965b). Kasem nominals: a study in analysis. Journal of West African Languages 2. 29–36.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Ph Y 2. 225–252.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. & Keyser, Samuel J. (1983). CV phonology: a generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Wim G. De (1986). A CV analysis of vowel hiatus in Kasem. In Beukema, F. & Hulk, A. (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 1986. Dordrecht: Foris. 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Wim G. de (1987). An autosegmental approach to vowel coalescence. Lingua 73. 149–181.Google Scholar
Haas, Wim G. de (1988). A formal theory of vowel coalescence: a case study of Ancient Greek. PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen. To be published, Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris (1978). Further thoughts on Kasem nominals. Linguistic Analysis 4. 167–185.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko (1986). Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael & Rubach, Jerzy (1987). The phonology of syllabic nuclei in Slovak. Lg 63. 463–497.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1973). Phonological representations. In Fujimura, O. (ed.) Three dimensions of phonological theory. Tokyo: TEC. 1–136.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In Yang, I.-S. (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1985). Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Ph Y 2. 85–138.Google Scholar
Levin, Juliette (1985). A metrical theory of syllabicity. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1979). Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1981). A prosodic theory of non-concatenative morphology. LI 12. 373–418.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan S. (1986). Prosodic morphology. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Phelps, Elaine (1975). Simplicity criteria in generative phonology: Kasem nominals. Linguistic Analysis I. 297–332.Google Scholar
Phelps, Elaine (1979). Abstractness and rule ordering in Kasem: a refutation of Halle's maximizing principle. Linguistic Analysis 5. 29–69.Google Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth (1986). The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1982). Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Wetzels, Leo (1987). The timing of latent consonants in Modern French. In Neidle, C. & Nuñez Cedeno, R. A. (eds.) Studies in Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris. 283–317.Google Scholar
Wetzels, Leo & Sezer, Engin (eds.) (1986). Studies in compensatory lengthening. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Moira (1988). The Obligatory Contour Principle and phonological rules: a loss of identity. LI 19. 65–100.Google Scholar