Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T14:34:13.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the existence of sonority-driven stress in Gujarati

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2018

Shu-hao Shih
Shu-hao Shih*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
*
E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents evidence against the existence of sonority-driven stress in Gujarati. Gujarati is one of the clearest and most revealing cases of sonority-driven stress with distinctions among peripheral vowels. A production experiment was performed to determine the accuracy of the claim that [a] attracts stress away from the default position. Of the five types of phonetic evidence examined, only F1 provides clear evidence for stress, revealing stress to be consistently penultimate, and not sonority-driven. As Gujarati is one of the core cases of sonority-driven stress, this finding challenges the claim that it exists. However, this paper does not exclude the possibility that stress may avoid schwa (or central vowels), as reported for several languages. Theoretical and methodological implications are discussed, particularly for theories that have a ‘symmetric effect’ and for descriptions that are impressionistic.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , May 2018 , pp. 327 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank Paul de Lacy for his detailed comments and suggestions on previous versions of this paper. I am grateful to the associate editor and four anonymous reviewers for their very thorough and helpful reviews. Matt Gordon and Akinbiyi Akinlabi also provided valuable advice and comments. I want to thank Pooja Patel for helping me construct the stimuli, and Chun-Yen Cheng and Dave Kleinschmidt for their help on statistics. For acoustic analysis, I thank my research assistants at Rutgers Phonology and Field Research Laboratory. All errors are my own.

References

Adenwala, Mridula (1965). The structural analysis of the phonology and morphemics of Gujarati. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barr, Dale J., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph & Tily, Harry J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68. 255–278.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Benjamin M. & Walker, Steven C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67. 1–48.Google Scholar
Berko, Jean (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14. 150–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, Lev (2006). Constraints on phonological interactions. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2016). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 6.0.21). http://www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. (1958). A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14. 109–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowern, Claire, Alpher, Barry & Round, Erich (2013). Yidiny stress, length, and truncation reconsidered. Poster presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the North-East Linguistic Society, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Bowers, Dustin (ms). Acoustic correlates of Gujarati stress: a failure to replicate. University of Alberta. Available (February 2018) at https://sites.google.com/site/dustinbowerslinguist/papers/Bowers16GujaratiSonorityStress.pdf.Google Scholar
Campbell, George L. (1995). Concise compendium of the world's languages. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, George L. & King, Gareth (2011). The Routledge concise compendium of the world's languages. 2nd edn. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cardona, George (1965). A Gujarati reference grammar. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardona, George & Suthar, Babu (2003). Gujarati. In Cardona, George & Jain, Dhanesh (eds.) The Indo-Aryan languages. London & New York: Routledge. 722–765.Google Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine M. (2001). Vowel reduction in Optimality Theory. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (2002). The formal expression of markedness. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (2004). Markedness conflation in Optimality Theory. Phonology 21. 145–199.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (2006). Markedness: reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (2007). The interaction of tone, sonority, and prosodic structure. In de Lacy, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 281–307.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (2014). Evaluating evidence for stress systems. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.) Word stress: theoretical and typological issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 149–193.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1977a). A grammar of Yidiɲ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1977b). Some phonological rules in Yidiny. LI 8. 1–34.Google Scholar
Dobrovolsky, Michael (1999). The phonetics of Chuvash stress: implications for phonology. In Ohala, John J., Hasegawa, Yoko, Ohala, Manjari, Granville, Daniel & Bailey, Ashlee C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California. 539–542.Google Scholar
Doctor, Raimond (2004). A grammar of Gujarati. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Everett, Keren Madora (1998). The acoustic correlates of stress in Pirahã. Journal of Amazonian Languages 1:2. 104–162.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. JASA 27. 765–768.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1. 126–152.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1965). The dependence of stress judgments on vowel formant structure. In Zwirner, Eberhard & Bethge, Wolfgang (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Münster, 1964. Basel & New York: Karger. 306–311.Google Scholar
Gandour, Jack (1977). On the interaction between tone and vowel length: evidence from Thai dialects. Phonetica 34. 54–65.Google Scholar
Garellek, Marc & White, James (2015). Phonetics of Tongan stress. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 45. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgeton, Laurianne & Fougeron, Cécile (2014). Domain-initial strengthening on French vowels and phonological contrasts: evidence from lip articulation and spectral variation. JPh 44. 83–95.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (2004). A phonological and phonetic study of word-level stress in Chickasaw. IJAL 70. 1–32.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Applebaum, Ayla (2010). Acoustic correlates of stress in Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 40. 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Nafi, Latifa (2012). Acoustic correlates of stress and pitch accent in Tashlhiyt Berber. JPh 40. 706–724.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Munro, Pamela (2007). A phonetic study of final vowel lengthening in Chickasaw. IJAL 73. 293–330.Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria (2003). Deriving economy: syncope in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Harris, J. Donald (1963). Loudness discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. Suppl. 11.Google Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor, Morton, John & Steffen-Batog, Maria (1968). The perception of stress in synthetic speech-like stimuli by Polish listeners. In Jassem, Wiktor (ed.) Speech analysis and synthesis. Vol. 1. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. 289–308.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael (1997). Quality-sensitive stress. Rivista di Linguistica 9. 157–187.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. JASA 59. 1208–1221.Google Scholar
Krueger, John R. (1961). Chuvash manual: introduction, grammar, reader, and vocabulary. Bloomington: Indiana University & The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Brockhoff, Per Bruun & Christensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen (2013). lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effect models. R package (version 2.0). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest.Google Scholar
Lambert, H. M. (1971). Gujarati language course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse, Teras, Pire, Help, Toomas, Lippus, Pärtel, Meister, Einar, Pajusalu, Karl & Viitso, Tiit-Rein (2005). Meadow Mari prosody. Tallinn: Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus.Google Scholar
Lenth, Russell V. (2016). Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software 69. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Susannah V. (2005). Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35. 73–97.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Philip (1960). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. JASA 32. 451–454.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, William J. & Marchal, Alain (eds.) Speech production and speech modelling. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 403–439.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P. (1991). The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Master, Alfred (1925). Stress accent in Modern Gujarātī. Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 1. 76–94.Google Scholar
Mistry, P. J. (1997). Gujarati phonology. In Kaye, A. S. (ed.) Phonologies of Asia and Africa (including the Caucasus). Vol. 2. Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns. 653–673.Google Scholar
Modi, Bharati (2013). Some issues in Gujarati phonology. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Nair, Usha (1979). Gujarati phonetic reader. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Oller, Kimbrough D. (1973). The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration. JASA 54. 1235–1247.Google Scholar
Pandit, P. B. (1958). Duration, syllable and juncture in Gujarati. Indian Linguistics 18 (Sir Ralph Turner Jubilee Volume 1). 212–218.Google Scholar
Patel, M. S. & Mody, J. J. (1960). The vowel system of Gujarati. Baroda: Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E. & Lehiste, Ilse (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. JASA 32. 693–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schiering, René & van der Hulst, Harry (2010). Word accent systems in the languages of Asia. In der Hulst, Harry van, Goedemans, Rob & van Zanten, Ellen (eds.) A survey of word accentual patterns in the languages of the world. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 509–613.Google Scholar
Sluijter, Agaath M. C. & van Heuven, Vincent J. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. JASA 100. 2471–2485.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlla S., Reilly, Christopher & Midkiff, Karen (1989). Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. Journal of Applied Psychology 74. 728–738.Google Scholar
Tabain, Marija, Fletcher, Janet & Butcher, Andrew (2014). Lexical stress in Pitjantjatjara. JPh 42. 52–66.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org.Google Scholar
Turner, R. L. (1921). Gujarati phonology. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 329–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbanczyk, Suzanne (1996). Patterns of reduplication in Lushootseed. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
van Santen, J. P. H. (1992). Contextual effects on vowel duration. Speech Communication 11. 513–546.Google Scholar
Vaysman, Olga (2009). Segmental alternations and metrical theory. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Whalen, D. H. & Levitt, Andrea G. (1995). The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. JPh 23. 349–366.Google Scholar
Wightman, Colin W., Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie, Ostendorf, Mari & Price, Patti J. (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. JASA 91. 1707–1717.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi (2013). ProsodyPro: a tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. In Bigi, Brigitte & Hirst, Daniel (eds.) Proceedings of TRASP 2013: tools and resources for the analysis of speech prosody. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage. 7–10.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Shih supplementary material

Shih supplementary material 1

Download Shih supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 66.2 KB