Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:40:04.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natalie Operstein (2010). Consonant structure and prevocalization. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 312.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Pp. x+234.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2015

Andrew Nevins
Andrew Nevins*
Affiliation:
University College London
*
E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Phonology , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , August 2015 , pp. 307 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, Henning (1972). Diphthongization. Lg 48. 11–50.Google Scholar
Backley, Phillip (2011). An introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2007). Spanish pseudoplurals: phonological cues in the acquisition of a syntax-morphology mismatch. In Baerman, Matthew, Corbett, Greville, Brown, Dunstan & Hippisley, Andrew (eds.) Deponency and morphological mismatches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 231–269.Google Scholar
Bisol, Leda (2013). O acento: duas alternativas de análise. Organon 28. 281–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrelli, Doris (2002). Raddoppiamento sintattico in Italian: a synchronic and diachronic cross-dialectal study. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1991). Place of articulation in consonants and vowels: a unified theory. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 5. 77–123.Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz (2010). Complexity scales and licensing in phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delattre, P. (1971). Pharyngeal features in the consonants of Arabic, German, Spanish, French, and American English. Phonetica 23. 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escure, Geneviève (1977). Hierarchies and phonological weakening. Lingua 43. 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, James (1977). Foundations of theoretical phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria (2003). Deriving economy: syncope in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Gudschinsky, Sarah C., Popovich, Harold & Popovich, Frances (1970). Native reaction and phonetic similarity in Maxakalí phonology. Lg 46. 77–88.Google Scholar
Harris, John (1987). On doing comparative reconstruction with genetically unrelated languages. In Ramat, Anna Giacalone, Carruba, Onofrio & Bernini, Giuliano (eds.) Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, Tore (1986). Cross-linguistic trends in the frequency of CV sequences. Phonology Yearbook 3. 179–195.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen (1992). Can [consonantal] spread? Lg 68. 313–332.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (2001). On the markedness of diphthongs. Kobe Papers in Linguistics 3. 60–73.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse (1965). Palatalization in Estonian: some acoustic observations. In Kõressaar, Viktor & Rannit, Aleksis (eds.) Estonian poetry and language: studies in honor of Ants Oras. Stockholm: Vaba Eesti. 136–162.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, Peter F. & Davis, Barbara L. (2000). On the origin of the internal structure of word forms. Science 288. 527–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martius, Carl Friedrich Philipp von (1867). Beiträge zur Ethnographie und Sprachenkunde Amerika's zumal Brasiliens. Vol. 2: Zur Sprachenkunde: Wor̈tersammlung Brasilianischer Sprachen. Leipzig: Fleischer.Google Scholar
Mascaró, Joan (1985). Compensatory diphthongization in Majorcan Catalan. In Wetzels, Leo & Sezer, Engin (eds.) Studies in compensatory lengthening. Dordrecht: Foris. 133–146.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew (2012). Vowel lenition and fortition in Brazilian Portuguese. Letras de Hoje 47. 228–233.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Karl J. (1970). Intrusive /i̯/ before /S/ in Brazilian Portuguese. Word 26. 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosapelly, Charles Léopold (1898). Caractères du vocaloïde: leur importance dans la distinction des consonnes. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 10. 122–134.Google Scholar
Silva, Mário Coelho & Nevins, Andrew (2014). Ethnosociophonology and consonant lenition in Maxakalí. Revista Linguíʃtica 10:2. 47–60.Google Scholar
Sledd, James (1966). Breaking, Umlaut, and the Southern drawl. Lg 42. 18–41.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard & Fujimura, Osamu (1993). Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. JPh 21. 291–311.Google Scholar
Wetzels, Leo & Sluyters, Willebrord (1995). Formação de raiz, formação de glide, e ‘decrowding’ fonético em Maxakalí. In Wetzels, Leo (ed.) Estudos fonológicos das línguas indígenas brasileiras. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ. 103–149.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Nevins supplementary audio files

Audio files

Download Nevins supplementary audio files(File)
File 3.1 MB