Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:40:34.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modularisation and substantive constraints in Dakota Lexical Phonology*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Patricia A. Shaw
Patricia A. Shaw
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most fundamental recurrent issues characterising the development of linguistic theory has been the relative degree and nature of ‘modularisation’ of the various components of the grammar. Two significant developments in recent phonological theory reflect this.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , May 1985 , pp. 173 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boas, Franz & Deloria, Ella (1941). Dakota grammar. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 23. Part 2.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (1978). Dakota accent. In Cook, E. -D. & Kaye, J. D. (eds.) Linguistic studies of native Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. 3–18.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. & Shaw, Patricia A. (1980). Systematic obfuscation of morphology in Dakota. LI II. 325–336.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Furby, Christine E. (1974). Garawa phonology. In Furby, Christine E., Hercus, Luise A. & Kilham, Christine. Papers in Australian Linguistics 7. (Pacific Linguistics Series A, No. 37). Canberra: Australian National University. 1–11.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris (1978). Formal and functional considerations in phonology. In Kachru, B. B. (ed.) Linguistics in the seventies: directions and prospects. Urbana: University of Illinois. 123–134.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Mohanan, K. P. (1985). Segmental phonology of Modern English. LI 16, 57–116.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. LI 13. 227–276.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (1977). On the nature of linguistic stress. In Hyman, Larry M. (ed.) Studies in stress and accent. USC Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4, 37–82.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1982a). Lexical morphology and phonology. In Yang, l.-S. (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1982b). How the levels are linked. Ms.Google Scholar
Mascaró, Joan (1976). Catalan phonology and the phonological cycle. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1982). Lexical phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. & Mohanan, T. (1984). Lexical Phonology of the consonant system in Malayalam. LI 15. 575–602.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, D. (1983). Tone in Lexical Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. To be published. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Rubach, J. (1981). Cyclic Phonology and palatalization in Polish and English. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar
Shaw, Patricia A. (1976). Theoretical issues in Dakota phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto, Published 1980, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Shaw, Patricia A. (1985). Coexistent and competing stress rules in Stoney. IJAL 51, 1–18.Google Scholar
Shaw, Patricia A. (forthcoming). The complex status of complex segments in Dakota. To appear in Gerdts, D. (ed.) Proceedings of the symposium on Canadian native languages in theoretical perspective. SUNY, Buffalo, 03 1985.Google Scholar
Walli, B. (1984). Complex segments in Kinyarwanda. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar