Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T05:40:45.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The local nature of tone-association patterns*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2017

Adam Jardine
Adam Jardine*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
*
E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A computational notion of locality, based on forbidden substructures of a fixed size, is applied to autosegmental representations, and tone-association patterns are argued to be local. This is significant for phonological theory, for two reasons. First, this notion of locality provides for an explicit theory of tonal well-formedness that is superior to previous explanations in that it makes clear, restrictive typological predictions. Second, it provides a clear path for understanding how these patterns can be learned. A brief survey of major tone-association patterns shows that association generalisations which are edge-based (Mende and Hausa), quality-specific (Kukuya) or positional (Northern Karanga Shona) are all local in this way. This is contrasted with previous explanations of the typology, which require global reference to the directionality of association, and can thus overgenerate.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , August 2017 , pp. 363 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Portions of this material were presented at the Berkeley Phonology Phorum, the 2015 Annual Meeting on Phonology, the University of Pennsylvania Common Ground colloquium, the 2015 Northeast Computational Phonology Circle, the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America and a Rutgers University invited colloquium talk. I thank the audiences of these presentations, and am grateful for the comments, questions and insights of two anonymous reviewers, Jeff Heinz, Bill Idsardi, Thomas Graf, Kevin McMullin, Jim Rogers and the members of the University of Delaware Phonology and Phonetics and Computational Linguistics groups. This research was supported by a 2015–16 University of Delaware Dissertation Fellows award.

References

REFERENCES

Archangeli, Diana & Pulleyblank, Douglas (1994). Grounded phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bird, Steven & Klein, Ewan (1990). Phonological events. JL 26. 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büchi, J. Richard (1960). Weak second-order arithmetic and finite automata. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 6. 66–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassimjee, Farida & Kisseberth, Charles W. (1998). Optimality Domains Theory and Bantu tonology: a case study from Isixhosa and Shingazidja. In Hyman, Larry M. & Kisseberth, Charles W. (eds.) Theoretical aspects of Bantu tone. Stanford: CSLI. 33–132.Google Scholar
Chandlee, Jane (2014). Strictly local phonological processes. PhD dissertation, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Chandlee, Jane, Eyraud, Rémi & Heinz, Jeffrey (2014). Learning Strictly Local subsequential functions. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2. 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, John & Local, John (1991). The ‘No Crossing Constraint’ in autosegmental phonology. Linguistics and Philosophy 14. 295–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, David (1978). What sort of tone language is Mende? Studies in African Linguistics 9. 167–208.Google Scholar
Eisner, Jason (1997a). Efficient generation in primitive Optimality Theory. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics. 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisner, Jason (1997b). What constraints should OT allow? Handout from paper presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago. Available as ROA-204 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Rui (2013). Efficiently listing combinatorial patterns in graphs. PhD dissertation, University of Pisa.Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios (1996). The articulatory basis of locality in phonology. PhD dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
García, Pedro, Vidal, Enrique & Oncina, José (1990). Learning locally testable languages in the strict sense. In Setsuo Arikawa, Shigeki Goto, Setsuo Ohsuga & Takashi Yokomori (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Algorithmic Learning Theory. 325–338.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John (1976). Autosegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Graf, Thomas (2010a). Comparing incomparable frameworks: a model theoretic approach to phonology. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 16:1. Available (May 2017) at: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol16/iss1/10.Google Scholar
Graf, Thomas (2010b). Logics of phonological reasoning. MA dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hammond, Michael (1988). On deriving the Well-Formedness Condition. LI 19. 319–325.Google Scholar
Haraguchi, Shosuke (1977). The tone pattern of Japanese: an autosegmental theory of tonology. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Heinz, Jeffrey (2007). The inductive learning of phonotactic patterns. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Heinz, Jeffrey (2009). On the role of locality in learning stress patterns. Phonology 26. 303–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, Jeffrey (2010a). Learning long-distance phonotactics. LI 41. 623–661.Google Scholar
Heinz, Jeffrey (2010b). String extension learning. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics. 897–906.Google Scholar
Heinz, Jeffrey, Rawal, Chetan & Tanner, Herbert G. (2011). Tier-based strictly local constraints for phonology. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Vol. 2. Association for Computational Linguistics. 58–64.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Mark & Prince, Alan (1989). OCP, locality, and linking: the N. Karanga verb. WCCFL 8. 176–191.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (1987). Prosodic domains in Kukuya. NLLT 5. 311–333.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2014). How autosegmental is phonology? The Linguistic Review 31. 363–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Adam (2014). Logic and the generative power of Autosegmental Phonology. In John Kingston, Claire Moore-Cantwell, Joe Pater & Robert Staubs (eds.) Proceedings of the 2013 Meeting on Phonology. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/amp.v1i1.4.Google Scholar
Jardine, Adam & Heinz, Jeffrey (2015). A concatenation operation to derive autosegmental graphs. In Proceedings of the 14th Meeting on the Mathematics of Language. Association for Computational Linguistics. 139–151.Google Scholar
Jardine, Adam & Heinz, Jeffrey (2016). Learning Tier-based Strictly 2-Local languages. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 4. 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Adam & Heinz, Jeffrey (in press). Markedness constraints are negative: an autosegmental constraint definition language. CLS 51.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Yasuhide (1970). Accent in the Hirosaki dialect of Japanese. MA thesis, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Kornai, András (1995). Formal phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (2012). Varieties of pitch accent systems in Japanese. Lingua 122. 1395–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leben, William R. (1973). Suprasegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. (1978). The representation of tone. In Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.) Tone: a linguistic survey. New York: Academic Press. 177–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leben, William R. (2006). Rethinking autosegmental phonology. In Mugane, John, Hutchison, John P. & Worman, Dee A. (eds.) Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla. 1–9.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1986). OCP effects: gemination and antigemination. LI 17. 207–263.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2003). OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20. 75–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1993). Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993. 79–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Scott (1987). Tone and the structure of words in Shona. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul (1986). Tone and affixation in Hausa. Studies in African Linguistics 17. 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Paul (2000). The Hausa language: an encyclopedic reference grammar. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ní Chiosáin, Máire & Padgett, Jaye (2001). Markedness, segment realization, and locality in spreading. In Lombardi, Linda (ed.) Segmental phonology in Optimality Theory: constraints and representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 118–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odden, David (1986). On the role of the Obligatory Contour Principle in phonology. Lg 62. 353–383.Google Scholar
Odden, David (1994). Adjacency parameters in phonology. Lg 70. 289–330.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas (1986). Tone in Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raimy, Eric (2000). The phonology and morphology of reduplication. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, James (1998). A descriptive approach to language-theoretic complexity. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Rogers, James, Heinz, Jeffrey, Fero, Margaret, Hurst, Jeremy, Lambert, Dakotah & Wibel, Sean (2013). Cognitive and sub-regular complexity. In Morrill, Glyn & Nederhof, Mark-Jan (eds.) Formal Grammar. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer. 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, Stephanie S. & Inkelas, Sharon (2014). A subsegmental correspondence approach to contour tone (dis)harmony patterns. In Kingston, John, Moore-Cantwell, Claire, Pater, Joe & Staubs, Robert (eds.) Proceedings of the 2013 Meeting on Phonology. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/amp.v1i1.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Wolfgang (1982). Classifying regular events in symbolic logic. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences 25. 360–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Douglas B. (2001). Introduction to graph theory. 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Wiebe, Bruce (1992). Modelling autosegmental phonology with multi-tape finite state transducers. MSc thesis, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (1988). Template morphology and the direction of association. NLLT 6. 551–577.Google Scholar
Zoll, Cheryl (2003). Optimal Tone Mapping. LI 34. 225–268.Google Scholar