Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T21:56:28.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irish palatalisation and the representation of place features*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Máire Ni Chiosáin
Máire Ni Chiosáin
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The structural relationship of the primary/consonantal place features and the secondary/vowel place features has been the focus of much recent work in geometrical and hierarchical feature theories. Sagey (1986), Halle (1986), Selkirk (1988, 1991a, b) and others propose representations in which the secondary/vowel place features are structurally dependent on primary/consonantal place features, while Archangeli & Pulleyblank (1987), Steriade (1987), Clements (1989, 1991), Hume (1990, 1992) and Odden (1991) argue for the structural independence of primary/consonantal and secondary/vowel place features, though to different degrees.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , May 1994 , pp. 89 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archangeli, D. & Pulleyblank, D. (1986). The content and structure of phonological representations. Ms, University of Arizona, Tucson & University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. & Pulleyblank, D. (1987). Maximal and minimal rules: effects of tier scansion. NELS 17. 16–35.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. & Pulleyblank, D. (1994). Grounded phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Avery, P. & Rice, K. (1989). Segment structure and coronal underspecification. Phonology 6. 179–200.Google Scholar
Bhat, D. N. S. (1974). A general study of palatalization. Stanford University Working Papers on Language Universals 14.Google Scholar
Broselow, E. & Niyondagara, A. (to appear). Morphological structure in Kirundi palatalization: implications for feature geometry. In Katamba, F. (ed.) Studies in inter-lacustrine Bantu phonology. Cologne: Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere.Google Scholar
Cheng, L. (1989). Feature geometry of vowels and co-occurrence restrictions in Cantonese. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1976). Palatalization: linking or assimilation? CLS 12. 96–109.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1989). A unified set of features for consonants and vowels. Ms, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1991). Place of articulation in consonants and vowels: a unified theory. To appear in Laks, B. & Rialland, A. (eds.) L'architecture et la géométrie des representations phonologiques. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Hume, E. V. (1993). The internal organization of segments. To appear in Goldsmith, J. (ed.) Handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
De Bhaldraithe, T. (1945). The Irish of Cois Fhairrge, Co. Galway. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
De Búrca, S. (1970). The Irish of Tourmakeady, Co. Mayo. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Gussmann, E. (1986). Autosegments, linked matrices and the Irish lenition. In Kastovsky, D. & Szwedek, A. (eds.) Linguistics across historical and geographic boundaries. Vol 2. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. 891–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. (1986). The intrinsic structure of speech sounds. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1986). Inalterability in CV-phonology. Lg 62. 321–351.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. LI 20. 253–306.Google Scholar
Hume, E. (1990). Front vowels, palatal consonants and the rule of umlaut in Korean. NELS 20. 230–243.Google Scholar
Hume, E. (1992). Front vowels, coronal consonants and their interaction in non-linear phonology. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. (1988). A survey of phonological features. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kelly, L. (1989). Irish consonant mutations: a feature geometry analysis. MA thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1985). Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, A. & Evers, V. (1991). Palatalization and coronality. In Paradis & Prunet (1991). 79–100.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (1987). An integrated theory of autosegmental processes. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 43. 84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massam, D. (1983). The morphology of Irish mutations. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 5.Google Scholar
Mester, R. A. (1986). Studies in tier structure. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Published 1988, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Mester, R. A. & Itô, J. (1989). Feature predictability and underspecification: palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics. Lg 65. 258–293.Google Scholar
Ni Chiosain, M. (1991). Topics in the phonology of Irish. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Ni Chiosain, M. (1992). Equipollent vowel features and radical underspecification: evidence from Irish. Paper presented at the 7th International Phonology Meeting, Krems, Austria.Google Scholar
Ni Chiosain, M. & Padgett, J. (1993). Inherent VPlace. Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center, University of California.Google Scholar
Odden, D. (1991). Vowel geometry. Phonology 8. 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Ó Siadhail, M. & Wigger, A. (1975). Coras fuaimeanna na Gaeilge. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Paradis, C. & Prunet, J.-F. (1989). On coronal transparency. Phonology 6. 317–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C. & Prunet, J.-F. (eds.) (1991). The special status of coronals: internal and external evidence. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G. (1989). The role of coronal in articulator-based features. CLS 25:1. 379–393.Google Scholar
Rice, K. & Avery, P. (1991). On the relationship between laterality and coronality. In Paradis & Prunet (1991). 101–124.Google Scholar
Sagey, E. (1986). The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Schein, B. & Steriade, D. (1986). On geminates. LI 17. 691–744.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1988). Dependency, place and the notion ‘tier’. Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1991a). Vowel height features: evidence for privativity and dependency. Paper presented at UQAM.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1991b). Major place in the vowel space: vowel height features. Paper presented at the Workshop on Phonological Feature Organization, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Shaw, P. A. (1991). Consonant harmony systems: the special status of coronal harmony. In Paradis & Prunet (1991). 125–157.Google Scholar
Smith, N. S. H. (1988). Consonant place features. In Van Der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. S. H. (eds.) Features, segmental structure and harmony processes. Part 1. Dordrecht: Foris. 209–235.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1987). Locality conditions and feature geometry. NELS 17. 595–618.Google Scholar
Szpyra, J. (1991). The phonological inventory of Polish and the vowel-consonant interaction. Ms, Catholic University of Lublin. Thurneysen, R. (1946). A grammar of Old Irish. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Zec, D. (1992). Palatalization as both coronalization and dorsalization. Paper presented at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar