Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T14:24:31.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: phonological models and experimental data*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2009

Andries W. Coetzee ,
René Kager  and
Joe Pater
Andries W. Coetzee
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
René Kager
Affiliation:
University of Utrecht
Joe Pater
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , May 2009 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barlow, Jessica A. & Gierut, Judith A. (1999). Optimality Theory in phonological acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42. 1482–1498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boersma, Paul & Hamann, Silke (eds.) (to appear). Phonology in perception. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Hayes, Bruce (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. LI 32. 45–86.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Levelt, Clara (2003). Optimality Theory and phonological acquisition. Annual Review of Language Acquisition 3. 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 219–252.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul (eds.) (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1981). Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In Hornstein, Norbert & Lightfoot, David (eds.) Explanation in linguistics: the logical problem of language acquisition. London: Longman. 32–75.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. (2008). Grammaticality and ungrammaticality in phonology. Lg 84. 218–257.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pater, Joe (2008). Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence in Muna and Arabic. NLLT 26. 289–337.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pater, Joe (to appear). The place of variation in phonological theory. In Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.) The handbook of phonological theory. 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellison, T. Mark (2000). The universal constraint set: convention, not fact. In Dekkers, Joost, Leeuw, Frank van der & de Weijer, Jeroen van (eds.) Optimality Theory: phonology, syntax, and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 524–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, Susanne & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.) (2006). Exemplar-based models in linguistics. Special issue. The Linguistic Review 23. 213–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. & Jenkins, James J. (1964). Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word 20. 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos & Kager, René (eds.) (2001). Phonetics in phonology. Thematic issue. Phonology 18. 1–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1980). A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.) (2004). Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth & Johnson, Keith (eds.) (2001). The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, René, Pater, Joe & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.) (2004). Constraints in phonological acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary E. (eds.) (1990). Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D. (1986). Today the world, tomorrow phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 27–43.Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott (2008). Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25. 83–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1986). Consumer's guide to evidence in phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. & Jaeger, Jeri J. (1986). Experimental phonology. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. & Ohala, Manjari (1986). Testing hypotheses regarding the psychological manifestation of morpheme structure constraints. In Ohala & Jaeger (1986). 239–252.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2003). Probabilistic phonology: discrimination and robustness. In Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer & Jannedy, Stefanie (eds.) Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 177–228.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet, Beckman, Mary E. & Ladd, D. R. (2000). Conceptual foundations of phonology as a laboratory science. In Burton-Roberts, Noel, Carr, Philip & Docherty, Gerard (eds.) Phonological knowledge: conceptual and empirical issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 273–303.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth (1986). The representation of features and relations in nonlinear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson T. & Ferreira, Victor S. (eds.) (2007). The state of the art in speech error research: Proceedings of the 2005 LSA Institute Workshop. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 53.Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul & Legendre, Géraldine (eds.) (2006). The harmonic mind from neural computation to Optimality Theoretic grammar. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tesar, Bruce & Smolensky, Paul (2000). Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar