Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T14:39:20.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clicks, concurrency and Khoisan*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2014

Julian Bradfield
Julian Bradfield*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
*
E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I propose that the notions of segment and phoneme be enriched to allow some concurrent clustering, even in classical theories. My main application is the Khoisan language !Xóõ, where treating clicks as phonemes concurrent with phonemic accompaniments allows the inventory size to be radically reduced, so solving the problems of many unsupported contrasts. I show also how phonological processes of !Xóõ can be described more elegantly in this setting, with support from metalinguistic evidence and production-task experiments. I describe a new allophony in !Xóõ. I go on to discuss other applications, some rather speculative, of the concept of concurrent phoneme. The article also provides a comprehensive review of the segmental phonetics and phonology of !Xóõ, together with previous analyses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Phonology , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , May 2014 , pp. 1 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Julian Bradfield 2014. Published by Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I thank colleagues at Edinburgh: Bob Ladd for many discussions over the years, and comments on drafts, Geoff Pullum and Patrick Honeybone for comments on a draft, and other members of the P-Group, particularly Alice Turk, Bert Remijsen and Satsuki Nakai, for comments following presentations. I am very grateful to Christfried Naumann and Linda Gerlach at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig for great generosity with unpublished DoBeS data, discussions and comments. Following talks, I received a number of helpful comments, from Dan Silverman, John Goldsmith, Krisztina Polgárdi, Amanda Miller, Tom Güldemann and others. I thank particularly Elan Dresher and Daniel Currie Hall for metatheoretical and theoretical suggestions. Finally I thank the reviewers and editors for their detailed and insightful comments.

References

REFERENCES

Arai, Takayuki (2006). Cue parsing between nasality and breathiness in speech perception. Acoustical Science and Technology 27. 298–301.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Quentin D. (2011). Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science 332. 346–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bale, Alan, Papillon, Maxime & Reiss, Charles (2013). Sets of features vs. sets of sets of features: a notational innovation for phonological rules. Poster presented at the 21st Manchester Phonology Meeting.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Plínio A. & Albano, Eleonora C. (2004). Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34. 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Janet (1996). Autosegments with three way lexical contrasts in Tuyuca. IJAL 62. 31–58.Google Scholar
Beach, D. M. (1938). The phonetics of the Hottentot language. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T., Traill, Anthony, Carter, Allyson, Harrison, K. David & Faber, Alice (2003). !Xóõ click perception by English, Isizulu, and Sesotho listeners. In Solé, M. J., Recasens, D. & Romero, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: Causal Productions. 853–856.Google Scholar
Besten, Michael Paul (2006). Transformation and reconstitution of Khoe-San identities. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2013). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.18). http://www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Botma, Bert (2004). Phonological aspects of nasality: an element-based dependency approach. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle (1974). Phonological features: problems and proposals. Lg 50. 52–65.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. (1997). The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ermisch, Sonja (ed.) (2008). Khoisan languages and linguistics: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium, January 8–12, 2006, Riezlern/Kleinwalsertal. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward (2003). The relationship between coronal place and vowel backness. Phonology 20. 335–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. (1950). Studies in African linguistic classification. VI: The click languages. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 6. 223–237.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom (2001). Phonological regularities of consonant systems across Khoisan. Leipzig: Institute of African Studies, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom & Elderkin, Edward D. (2010). On external genealogical relationships of the Khoe family. In Brenzinger, Matthias & König, Christa (eds.) Khoisan languages and linguistics: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium, January 4–8, 2003, Riezlern/Kleinwalsertal. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe. 15–52.Google Scholar
Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. & Eiseb, Eliphas (2002). A Khoekhoegowab dictionary. Windhoek: Gamsberg Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hall, Kathleen Currie (2009). A probabilistic model of phonological relationships from contrast to allophony. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Honken, Henry (2010). The Kx'a family: a new Khoisan genealogy. Journal of Asian and African Studies 79. 5–36.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan Bybee (1981). The empirical determination of phonological representations. In Myers, Terry, Laver, John & Anderson, John (eds.) The cognitive representation of speech. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 347–357.Google Scholar
IPA (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman (1968). Extra-pulmonic consonants (ejectives, implosives, clicks). Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics 90. 221–227.Google Scholar
Kießling, Roland (2008). Noun classification in !Xoon. In Ermisch (2008). 225–248.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (2014). Simultaneous structure in phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian (1996). The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford & Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Traill, Anthony (1984). Linguistic phonetic description of clicks. Lg 60. 1–20.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F. & Fennig, Charles D. (eds.) (2013). Ethnologue: languages of the world. 17th edn. Dallas: SIL International. Available at http://www.ethnologue.com.Google Scholar
Mayo, Carolyn M. & Mayo, Robert (2011). Normative nasalance values across languages. ECHO 6:1. 22–32.Google Scholar
Miller, Amanda L. (2011). The representation of clicks. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 416–439.Google Scholar
Miller, Amanda L., Brugmann, Johanna, Sands, Bonny, Namaseb, Levi, Exter, Mats & Collins, Chris (2009). Differences in airstream and posterior place of articulation among N|uu clicks. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 39. 129–161.Google Scholar
Miller, Amanda L., Namaseb, Levi & Iskarous, Khalil (2007). Tongue body constriction differences in click types. In Cole, Jennifer & Hualde, Jose Ignacio (eds.) Laboratory phonology 9. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 643–656.Google Scholar
Miller-Ockhuizen, Amanda L. (2003). The phonetics and phonology of gutturals: a case study from Ju|'hoansi. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Hiroshi (2006). Aspects of the phonetic and phonological structure of the G|ui language. PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Naumann, Christfried (2008). High and low tone in Taa ǂaa (!Xóõ). In Ermisch (2008). 279–302.Google Scholar
Naumann, Christfried (forthcoming). The phoneme inventory of Taa (West !Xoon dialect). In Vossen, Rainer & Haacke, Wilfred H. G. (eds.) Essays in memory of Anthony Traill. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, C. S., Hendrick, R. A. & Miller, M. F. (eds.) Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 178–203.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. Online edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com.Google Scholar
Peng, Long (2000). Nasal harmony in three South American languages. IJAL 66. 76–97.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon, Pettinato, Michèle & Dupoux, Emmanuel (2003). Allophonic variation and the acquisition of phoneme categories. In Beachley, Barbara, Brown, Amanda & Conlin, Francis (eds.) Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville: Cascadilla. 650–661.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Raphael, Lawrence J. (2005). Acoustic cues to the perception of segmental phonemes. In Pisoni, David B. & Remez, Robert E. (eds.) The handbook of speech perception. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 182–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze Jena, Leonhard (1928). Zur Kenntnis des Körpers der Hottentotten und Buschmänner. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Snyman, J. W. (1970). An introduction to the !Xũ (!Kung) language. Cape Town: Balkema.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry (1877). A handbook of phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Theraphan, Thongkum L. (1991). An instrumental study of Chong registers. In Davidson, Jeremy H. C. S. (ed.) Austroasiatic languages: essays in honour of H. L. Shorto. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 141–160.Google Scholar
Tolkien, John Ronald Reuel (1966). The return of the King. 2nd edn. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Traill, Anthony (1985). Phonetic and phonological studies of !Xóõ Bushman. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Traill, Anthony (1991). Pulmonic control, nasal venting, and aspiration in Khoisan languages. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 21. 13–18.Google Scholar
Traill, Anthony (1993). The feature geometry of clicks. In van Staden, P. M. S. (ed.) Linguistica: Festschrift E. B. van Wyk: ’n huldeblyk. Pretoria: van Schaik. 134–140.Google Scholar
Traill, Anthony (1994). A !Xóõ dictionary. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard (1996). The phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bradfield Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Bradfield Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 276.8 KB