Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:37:18.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

B. Elan Dresher (2009). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 121.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. xii+280.

Review products

B. Elan Dresher (2009). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 121.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. xii+280.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2010

Paul de Lacy
Paul de Lacy
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , December 2010 , pp. 532 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archangeli, Diana (1984). Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ard, Josh (1984). Vowel harmony in Manchu: a critical overview. JL 20. 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea (2005). Markedness and economy in a derivational model of phonology. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dyck, Carrie (1995). Constraining the phonology–phonetics interface, with exemplification from Spanish and Italian dialects. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Hayata, Teruhiro (1980). Non-abstract vowel harmony in Manchu. Gengo Kenkyu 77. 59–79.Google Scholar
Herd, Jonathon (2005). Loanword adaptation and the evaluation of similarity. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 24. 65–116.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. (1955). A manual of phonology. Baltimore: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1985). Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitto, Catherine (1997). Epenthesis and Polynesian loanwords. MA dissertation, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Martinet, André (1960). Éléments de linguistique générale. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: van der Hoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Vago, Robert M. (1973). Abstract vowel harmony systems in Uralic and Altaic languages. Lg 49. 579–605.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xi (1996). Vowel systems of the Manchu-Tungus languages of China. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar