Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:51:43.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The treatment of long vowels in word games*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Robert M. Vago
Robert M. Vago
Affiliation:
Queens College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the current nonlinear model of CV phonology (Clements & Keyser 1983), phonological representations are organised into several levels or tiers, of which the following three are the most significant: the central CV tier (skeleton), whose units, C and V, are autosegmentally associated with the units of the syllable tier on one end and with the units of the segmental tier on the other. The segmental tier itself is organised into subtiers of distinctive features; the internal structure of the syllable tier is subject to considerable debate in the literature. In addition, CV-level units may be linked to melodies on separate autosegmental tiers in the case of suprasegmental phenomena like tone and vowel harmony.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , May 1985 , pp. 329 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERNCES

Aronoff, M. & Oehrle, R. T. (eds.) (1984). Language sound structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1980). The psychological and sociological reality of Finnish vowel harmony. In Vago, R. M. (ed.) Issues in vowel harmony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 245–270.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1981). Generative phonology vs. Finnish phonology: retrospect and prospect. In Goyvaerts, D. L. (ed.) Phonology in the 1980's. Ghent: Story-Scientia. 147–182.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & M., Halle (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (to appear). Compensatory lengthening and consonant gemination in Luganda. In Sezer, E. & Wetzels, L. (eds.) Studies in compensatory lengthening. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Keyser, S. J. (1983). CV phonology: a generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Conklin, H. C. (1956). Tagalog speech disguise. Lg 32. 136–139.Google Scholar
Conklin, H. C. (1959). Linguistic play in its cultural context. Lg 35. 631–636.Google Scholar
Coupez, A. (1969). Une leçon de linguistique. Africa-Tervuren 15 1–5.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Haas, M. R. (1969). Burmese disguised speech. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 39. 277–285.Google Scholar
Hombert, J.-M. (1973). Speaking backwards in Bakwiri. Studies in African Linguistics 4. 227–236.Google Scholar
Hombert, J.-M. (1976). Word games: some implications for analysis of tone and other phonological processes. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 33. 67–80.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (1984). Syllable structure and stress in Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der & Smith, N. (eds.) (1982). The structure of phonological representations. 2 vols. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (1982). The representation of length in Gokana. In Flickinger, D. P., Macken, M. & Wiegand, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the First West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford: Linguistics Department, Stanford University. 198–206.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (1984). A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Ingria, R. (1980). Compensatory lengthening as a metrical phenomenon. LI II. 465–495.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. (1982). Gemination and spirantization in Tigrinya. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12. 103–122.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1982). From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In van der, Hulst & Smith, (1982: vol. 1). 131–175.Google Scholar
Keyser, S. J. & P., Kiparsky (1984). Syllable structure in Finnish phonology. In Aronoff, & Oehrle, (1984). 7–31.Google Scholar
Leben, W. (1980). A metrical analysis of length. LI 11. 497–509.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1985). An Estonian word game and the phonematic status of long vowels. LI 16. 490–492.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (1982). Prosodic templates, morphemic templates, and morphemic tiers. In van der, Hulst & Smith, (1982: vol. 1). 191–223.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (to appear). Formal morphology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. & Mohanan, T. (1984). Lexical Phonology of the consonant system of Malayalam. LI 15. 575–602.Google Scholar
Ojansuu, H. (1916). Suomen kielen tutkimuksen tyomaalta. Sarja esitelmiä I. Jyväskylä: Gummerus.Google Scholar
Prince, A. S. (1980). A metrical theory for Estonian quantity. LI 11. 511–562.Google Scholar
Prince, A. S. (1984). Phonology with tiers. In Aronoff, & Oehrle, (1984). 234–244.Google Scholar
Schein, B. (1981). Spirantization in Tigrinya. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 3. 32–42.Google Scholar
Seppänen, J. (1982). Computing families of natural secret languages: an exercise in functional lingustics. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology Computing Centre.Google Scholar
Sherzer, J. (1970). Talking backwards in Cuna: the sociological reality of phonological descriptions. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 26. 631–636.Google Scholar
Stemberger, J. P. (1984). Length as a suprasegmental: evidence from speech errors. Lg 60. 895–953.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. & Schein, B. (1984). On gemination. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Vago, R. M. (1984). Morpheme level harmony in a multi-leveled autosegmental framework. Ms, Tel-Aviv University.Google Scholar
Vago, R. M. (to appear). On the representation of length. In Dressler, W. U. et al. (eds.) Phonologica 1984. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar