Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T15:24:00.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Questioning the universality of the syllable: evidence from Japanese*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2012

Laurence Labrune
Laurence Labrune
Affiliation:
University of Bordeaux
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reexamines the issue of the mora, the foot and the syllable in Tokyo Japanese, and shows that whereas the mora and the foot are indisputably present and active, the evidence for the syllable is inconspicuous and disputable. Building on this observation, I claim that Tokyo Japanese makes no use of the syllable. Instead, two types of mora are distinguished: regular CV moras and weak (deficient) moras. Weak moras include the moraic nasal, the first part of a geminate and the second part of a long vowel, as well as moras containing an onsetless vowel, a devoiced vowel or an epenthetic vowel. I further argue that feet obey a set of structural constraints stipulating that they be properly headed by a regular full mora. With this enriched notion of mora type, the paper argues that neither the syllable nor any other level of the prosodic hierarchy is obligatory in all languages.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , May 2012 , pp. 113 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akinaga, Kazue (1968). Iwayuru tokushu onsetsu (tokushu haku) ni tsuite. [Concerning the so-called special syllables (special moras).] Kôza nihongo kyôiku [Teaching Japanese as a second language] 4. 36–51.Google Scholar
Bagemihl, Bruce (1991). Syllable structure in Bella Coola. LI 22. 589–646.Google Scholar
Beckman, Jill N. (1999). Positional faithfulness: an Optimality Theoretic treatment of phonological asymmetries. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary & Shoji, Atsuko (1984). Spectral and perceptual evidence for CV coarticulation in devoiced /si/ and /syu/ in Japanese. Phonetica 41. 61–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloch, Bernard (1950). Studies in colloquial Japanese IV: phonemics. Lg 26. 86–125. Reprinted in Roy Andrew Miller (ed.) (1970). Bernard Bloch on Japanese. New Haven & London: Yale University Press. 113–165.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi (1994). Principles of English stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Nick & Sagisaka, Yoshinori (1991). Moraic and syllable-level effects on speech timing. IEICJ Technical Report SP90-107. 35–40.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart (1988). Syllable onsets as a factor in stress rules. Phonology 5. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, Laura J. (1998). On the prosodic misalignment of onsetless syllables. NLLT 16. 1–52.Google Scholar
Durand, Jacques & Lyche, Chantal (2004). Structure et variation dans quelques systèmes vocaliques du français: l'enquête Phonologie du français contemporain (PFC). In Coveney, Aisan, Hintze, Marie-Anne & Sanders, Carol (eds.) Variation et francophonie. Paris: L'Harmattan. 217–240.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Levinson, Stephen C. (2009). The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everett, Dan & Everett, Keren (1984). On the relevance of syllable onsets to stress placement. LI 15. 705–711.Google Scholar
Faber, Alice & Vance, Timothy J. (2000). More acoustic traces of ‘deleted’ vowels in Japanese. In Nakayama, Mineharu & Quinn, Charles J. Jr. (eds.) Japanese/Korean linguistics. Vol. 9. Stanford: CSLI. 100–113.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline & de Vijver, Ruben van (eds.) (2003). The syllable in Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudge, E. C. (1969). Syllables. JL 5. 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golston, Chris & van der Hulst, Harry (1999). Stricture is structure. In Hermans, Ben & van Oostendorp, Marc (eds.) The derivational residue in phonological Optimality Theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 153–173.Google Scholar
Han, Mieko S. (1994). Acoustic manifestations of mora timing in Japanese. JASA 96. 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraguchi, Shosuke (1977). The tone pattern of Japanese: an autosegmental theory of tonology. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Haraguchi, Shosuke (1991). A theory of stress and accent. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraguchi, Shosuke (1999). Accent. In Tsujimura (1999). 1–30.Google Scholar
Haraguchi, Shosuke (2003). The phonology–phonetics interface and Syllabic Theory. In de Weijer, Jeroen van, van Heuven, Vincent J. & Hulst, Harry van der (eds.) The phonological spectrum. Vol. 2: Suprasegmental structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattori, Shirô (1954). On'inron kara mita kokugo no akusento. [Japanese accent from a phonological perspective.] Kokugo KenkyÛ 2–3. Reprinted in Takeshi Shibata, Hajime Kitamura & Haruhiko Kindaichi (eds.) (1980). Nihon no gengogaku. [Linguistics in Japan.] Vol. 2: On'in. [Phonology.] Tokyo: TaishÛkan. 364–404.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. LI 20. 253–306.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Higurashi, Yoshiko (1983). The accent of extended word structures in Tokyo Standard Japanese. Tokyo: EDUCA.Google Scholar
Hirayama, Teruo et al. (1993). Gendai nihongo hôgen daijiten. [Comprehensive dictionary of Modern Japanese dialects.] 9 vols. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. (1955). A manual of phonology. Baltimore: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Homma, Yayoi (1981). Durational relationship between Japanese stops and vowels. JPh 9. 273–281.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2003). A theory of phonological weight. Reissue edition, with a foreword by William R. Leben. Stanford: CSLI. Originally published 1985, Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2008). Universals in phonology. The Linguistic Review 25. 83–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2009). How (not) to do phonological typology: the case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31. 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2011). Does Gokana really have no syllables? Or: what's so great about being universal? Phonology 28. 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idemaru, Kaori (2005). An acoustic and perceptual investigation of the geminate and singleton stop contrast in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko (1990). Prosodic minimality in Japanese. CLS 26:2. 213–239.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin (2003). Weak layering and word binarity. In Honma, Takeru, Okazaki, Masao, Tabata, Toshiyuki & Tanaka, Shin'ichi (eds.) A new century of phonology and phonological theory: a Festschrift for Professor Shosuke Haraguchi on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. Tokyo: Kaitakusha. 26–65.Google Scholar
Kager, René (1997). Rhythmic vowel deletion in Optimality Theory. In Roca, Iggy (ed.) Derivations and constraints in phonology. Oxford: Clarendon. 463–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katada, Fusa (1990). On the representation of moras: evidence from a language game. LI 21. 641–646.Google Scholar
Kelly, Michael H. (2004). Word onset patterns and lexical stress in English. Journal of Memory and Language 50. 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael (1994). Sonority-driven stress. Ms, MIT. Available as ROA-33 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Haruhiko (1972). Onsetsu, môra oyobi haku. [Syllable, mora and haku.] Nihongo on'in no kenkyÛ. [Research in Japanese phonology.] Tokyo: Tôkyôdô Shuppan. 58–77.Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Haruhiko & Akinaga, Kazue (eds.) (2001). Shinmeikai nihongo akusento jiten. [Shinmeikai Japanese accent dictionary.] Tokyo: Shinmeikai.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1966). Is the syllable a phonological universal? JL 2. 207–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (1985). Speech errors and syllable structure. Linguistics and Philology 6. 220–243.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (1989). The mora and syllable structure in Japanese: evidence from speech errors. Language and Speech 32. 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (1994). Nihongo no onsetsuryô ni tsuite. [Syllable quantity in Japanese.] Kokugogaku 178. 7–17.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (1995). Perceptual evidence for the mora in Japanese. In Connell, Bruce & Arvaniti, Amalia (eds.) Phonology and phonetic evidence: papers in laboratory phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (1996). Syllable and accent in Japanese: evidence from loanword accentuation. Onsei Kaihô [Bulletin of the Phonetic Society of Japan] 211. 71–82.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (1998). Môra to onsetsu no huhensei. [On the universality of mora and syllable.] Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 2:1. 5–15.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (1999). Mora and syllable. In Tsujimura (1999). 31–61.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (2003). The syllable as a unit of prosodic organization in Japanese. In Féry, & van de Vijver, (2003). 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (2006a). Phonetic and phonological organization of speech in Japanese. In Nakayama, Mineharu, Mazuka, Reiko & Shirai, Yasuhiro (eds.) The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics. Vol. 2: Japanese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (2006b). Where does loanword prosody come from? A case study of Japanese loanword accent. Lingua 116. 1140–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kureta, Yoichi, Fushimi, Takao & Tatsumi, Itaru F. (2006). The functional unit of phonological encoding: evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 32. 1102–1119.Google ScholarPubMed
Labrune, Laurence (2002). The prosodic structure of simple abbreviated loanwords in Japanese: a constraint-based account. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 6:1. 98–120.Google Scholar
Labrune, Laurence (2007). Morphophonologie des emprunts abrégés en japonais: aspects prosodiques et mélodiques. In Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth & Labrune (, Laurenceeds.) Des sons et des sens, données et modèles en phonologie et en morphologie. Paris: Hermès. 173–198.Google Scholar
Labrune, Laurence (2012). The phonology of Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Yen-Hwei (1997). Syllabic and moraic structures in Piro. Phonology 14. 403–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean (1996). CV as the only syllable type. In Durand, Jacques & Laks, Bernard (eds.) Current trends in phonology: models and methods. Salford: ESRI. 419–441.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. (1968). The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian (1985). Phonetic cues to syllabification. In Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.) Phonetic linguistics: essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged. Orlando: Academic Press. 203–221.Google Scholar
Mehler, Jacques, Dommergues, Jean Yves & Frauenfelder, Uli (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20. 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, Takeo (1943). Kokumin gakkô akusento kaisetsu daiichigakunen yô. [Comments on accent for first year level in public schools.] Tokyo: Kokugo Bunka Kenkyuujo.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Newman, Stanley (1947). Bella Coola I: phonology. IJAL 13. 129–134.Google Scholar
NHK (1998). Nihongo hatsuon akusento jiten. [A dictionary of Japanese pronunciation and accentuation.] Tokyo: NHK.Google Scholar
Ogasawara, Naomi & Warner, Natasha (2009). Processing missing vowels: allophonic processing in Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes 24. 376–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otake, Takashi & Cutler, Anne (1996). Phonological structure and language processing: cross-linguistic studies. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otake, Takashi, Hatano, Giyoo, Cutler, Anne & Mehler, Jacques (1993). Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language 32. 258–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Beckman, Mary E. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Poser, William J. (1984). The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Poser, William J. (1990). Evidence for foot structure in Japanese. Lg 66. 78–105.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Satô, Ryôichi (2002). Gendai nihongo no hatsuon bunpu. [Geographical distribution of phones in modern Japanese.] In Hida, Yoshifumi & Satô, Takeyoshi (eds.) Gendai nihongo kôza. [Lectures on Contemporary Japanese.] Vol. 3. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin. 20–39.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias (2004). A lateral theory of phonology: what is CVCV, and why should it be? Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiering, René, Bickel, Balthazar & Hildebrandt, Kristine A. (2010). The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent. JL 46. 657–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (1984). Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (1995). The prosodic structure of function words. In Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura Walsh & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.) Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst: GLSA. 439–469.Google Scholar
Shinohara, Shigeko (2000). Default accentuation and foot structure in Japanese: evidence from Japanese adaptations of French words. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9. 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Shin'ichi (1998). Hutto-nai ni okeru boin no kikoe to hukugôgo akusento. [Compound accent and vowel sonority within the foot.] Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 2:1. 50–62.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Shin'ichi (2008). Rizumu-akusento no ‘yure’ to on'in-keitai kôzô. [Accent rhythm variation and the phonological and morphological structure of words.] Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Shin-ichi (2001). Optional optimality and optimal optionality: an integrated model of accent and accent shift phenomena in Japanesecitation id="ref089". Paper presented at the Phonology Forum, Meikai University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Terao, Yasushi (1992). Bunsanshutsu kenkyÛ kara mita onsetsu – mora. [Mora and syllable from the point of view of dispersion theory.] Nihongo no môra to onsetsu kôzô ni kansuru sôgôteki kenkyÛ. [Comprehensive studies on mora and syllable structure in Japanese.] Vol. 1. Tsukuba: University of Tsukuba. 62–75.Google Scholar
Terao, Yasushi (2002). Iimachigai ha dôshite okoru? [Why do slips of the tongue occur?] Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Terao, Yasushi (2008). Iimachigai shiryô ni yoru gengo sanshutsu moderu no kenshô. [Comparing language production models: evidence from Japanese speech errors.] Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 12. 17–27.Google Scholar
Topintzi, Nina (2010). Onsets: suprasegmental and prosodic behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.) (1999). The handbook of Japanese linguistics. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ujihira, Akira & Kubozono, Haruo (1994). A phonetic and phonological analysis of stuttering in Japanese. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 94). Yokohama: Acoustical Society of Japan. 1195–1199.Google Scholar
Uwano, Zendô (2003). Akusento no taikei to shikumi. [The mechanics and system of Japanese accent.] In Kitahara, Yasuo & Uwano, Zendô (eds.) Asakura nihongo kôza. [Asakura lectures on Japanese.] Vol. 3: Onsei – on'in. [Phonetics – phonology.] Tokyo: Asakura Shuppan. 61–84.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. (1987). An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. (2008). The sounds of Japanese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verdonschot, Rinus (2011). Word processing in languages using non-alphabetic scripts: the case of Japanese and Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Warner, Natasha & Arai, Takayuki (2001). Japanese mora-timing: a review. Phonetica 58. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yokotani, Teruo (1997). Hutto gyôkai wo koeru akusento idô: tôkyô hôgen hukugô meishi kara no shôko. [Accent shift beyond the foot boundary: evidence from Tokyo Japanese compound nouns.] Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 1. 54–62.Google Scholar
Yoshida, Shohei (1990). A government-based analysis of the ‘mora’ in Japanese. Phonology 7. 331–351.Google Scholar
Yoshida, Shohei (1991). Some aspects of governing relations in Japanese phonology. PhD dissertation, SOAS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zec, Draga (1988). Sonority constraints on syllable structure. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Zec, Draga (2003). Prosodic weight. In Féry, & van de Vijver, (2003). 123–143.Google Scholar