Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T15:24:41.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lenition, fortition and the status of plosive affrication: the case of spontaneous RP English /t/*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2012

Emanuela Buizza  and
Leendert Plug
Emanuela Buizza
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Leendert Plug
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports on a phonetic and phonological study of /t/-affrication in spontaneous British English Received Pronunciation. The study is motivated by the uncertainty surrounding plosive affrication in the literature on lenition and fortition. We suggest that a decision as to the status of a given pattern involving affrication in terms of lenition or fortition should be based on thorough phonetic and phonological analysis. We present a phonetic and phonological account of /t/-affrication, which takes into consideration the temporal and spectral characteristics of the sounds involved, as well as their distribution across phonological environments. Crucially, we compare affricated instances of /t/ with aspirated and fricated ones in the same dataset – the former arguably unmarked in this variety, the latter uncontroversially the result of lenition. We argue that the phonetic and phonological characteristics of /t/-affrication presented in this paper are consistent with an account in terms of fortition rather than lenition.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , May 2012 , pp. 1 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bauer, Laurie (2008). Lenition revisited. JL 44. 605–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., Edwards, Jan & Fletcher, Janet (1992). Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics. In Docherty, Gerard J. & Ladd, D. Robert (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Hamann, Silke (2008). The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. Phonology 25. 217–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.34). http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Brandão de Carvalho, Joaquim, Scheer, Tobias & Ségéral, Philippe (eds.) (2008). Lenition and fortition. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis (1990). Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary E. (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 341–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bye, Patrik & de Lacy, Paul (2008). Metrical influences on fortition and lenition. In Brandão de Carvalho et al. (2008). 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catford, J. C. (2001). A practical introduction to phonetics. 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong, McQueen, James & Cox, Ethan A. (2007). Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: the case of domain-initial strengthening in English. JPh 35. 210–243.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (2009). Does sonority have a phonetic basis? In Raimy, Eric & Cairns, Charles E. (eds.) Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonology. Cambridge, Mass. & London: MIT Press. 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Keyser, Samuel J. (1983). CV phonology: a generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Beverley S. & Mees, Inger M. (2008). Practical phonetics and phonology: a resource book for students. 2nd edn.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan (2008). Gimson's pronunciation of English. 7th edn.London: Hodder.Google Scholar
Cser, András (2003). The typology and modelling of obstruent lenition and fortition processes. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
De Jong, Kenneth J. (2011). Flapping in American English. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 2711–2729.Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia J. & Stampe, David (1979). The study of natural phonology. In Dinnsen, Daniel A. (ed.) Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 126–173.Google Scholar
Escure, Geneviève (1977). Hierarchies and phonological weakening. Lingua 43. 55–64.Google Scholar
Ewen, Colin J. & van der Hulst, Harry (2001). The phonological structure of words: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, James (1977). Foundations of theoretical phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile & Keating, Patricia A. (1997). Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. JASA 101. 3728–3740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gimson, A. C. (1970). An introduction to the pronunciation of English. 2nd edn.London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur (2008). Diachronic explanations of sound patterns. Language and Linguistics Compass 2. 859–893.Google Scholar
Harris, James W. & Kaisse, Ellen M. (1999). Palatal vowels, glides and obstruents in Argentinian Spanish. Phonology 16. 117–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John (1990). Segmental complexity and phonological government. Phonology 7. 255–300.Google Scholar
Harris, John (1994). English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich & Joseph, Brian D. (1996). Language history, language change, and language relationship: an introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick (2001). Lenition inhibition in Liverpool English. English Language and Linguistics 5. 213–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick (2005). Sharing makes us stronger: process inhibition and segmental structure. In Carr, Philip, Durand, Jacques & Ewen, Colin J. (eds.) Headhood, elements, specification and contrastivity: phonological papers in honour of John Anderson. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 167–192.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick (2008). Lenition, weakening and consonantal strength: tracing concepts through the history of phonology. In Brandão de Carvalho et al. (2008). 9–92.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark J. & Llamas, Carmen (2008). Fricated realisations of /t/ in Dublin and Middlesbrough English: an acoustic analysis of plosive frication and surface fricative contrasts. English Language and Linguistics 12. 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark J. & McDougall, Kirsty (2009). The acoustic character of fricated /t/ in Australian English: a comparison with /s/ and /ʃ/. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 39. 265–289.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A., Cho, Taehong, Fougeron, Cécile & Hsu, Chai-Shune (2003). Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages. In Local, John, Ogden, Richard & Temple, Rosalind (eds.) Phonetic interpretation: papers in laboratory phonology VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 145–163.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert (2000). Geminate inalterability and lenition. Lg 76. 509–545.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert (2001a). An effort-based approach to consonant lenition. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert (2001b). Phonological contrast and articulatory effort. In Lombardi, Linda (ed.) Segmental phonology in Optimality Theory: constraints and representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 79–117.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert (2004). Consonant lenition. In Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.) Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, Gerald O. (1973). Scouse: the urban dialect of Liverpool. PhD dissertation, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Kuzla, Claudia & Ernestus, Mirjam (2011). Prosodic conditioning of phonetic detail in German plosives. JPh 39. 143–155.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger (1984). Phonology: an introduction to basic concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger & Anderson, John M. (1975). Old English phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lavoie, Lisa M. (2001). Consonant strength: phonological patterns and phonetic manifestations. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Lavoie, Lisa M. (2002). Subphonemic and suballophonic consonant variation: the role of the phoneme inventory. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 28. 39–54.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, William J. & Marchal, Alain (eds.) Speech production and speech modelling. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 403–439.Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna (2008). Lenition in Tuscan Italian (Gorgia Toscana). In Brandão de Carvalho et al. (2008). 235–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna & Barth, Marlen (2005). Acoustic and sociolinguistic aspects of lenition in Liverpool English. Studi Linguistici e Filologici Online 3. 377–413.Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard (2009). An introduction to English phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1993). The phonetics of sound change. In Jones, Charles (ed.) Historical linguistics: problems and perspectives. London: Longman. 237–278.Google Scholar
Olive, Joseph P., Greenwood, Alice & Coleman, John (1993). Acoustics of American English speech: a dynamic approach. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Pandeli, Helen, Eska, Joseph F., Ball, Martin J. & Rahilly, Joan (1997). Problems of phonetic transcription: the case of the Hiberno-English slit-t. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 27. 65–75.Google Scholar
Roach, Peter (2004). British English: Received Pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34. 239–245.Google Scholar
Sangster, Catherine M. (2001). Lenition of alveolar stops in Liverpool English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5. 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ségéral, Philippe & Scheer, Tobias (2008). Positional factors in lenition and fortition. In Brandão de Carvalho et al. (2008). 131–172.Google Scholar
Shockey, Linda (2003). Sound patterns of spoken English. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silverman, Daniel (2004). On the phonetic and cognitive nature of alveolar stop allophony in American English. Cognitive Linguistics 15. 69–93.Google Scholar
Silverman, Daniel (2006). The diachrony of labiality in Trique, and the functional relevance of gradience and variation. In Goldstein, Louis, Whalen, D. H. & Best, Catherine T. (eds.) Laboratory phonology 8. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 133–152.Google Scholar
Simpson, Adrian P. (2001). Does articulatory reduction miss more patterns than it accounts for? Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31. 29–39.Google Scholar
Smiljanić, Rajka & Bradlow, Ann R. (2009). Speaking and hearing clearly: talker and listener factors in speaking style changes. Language and Linguistics Compass 3. 236–264.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer L. (2005). Phonological augmentation in prominent positions. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Szigetvári, Péter (2008). What and where? In Brandão de Carvalho et al. (2008). 93–129.Google Scholar
Taylor, Mary Vaiana (1974). The great southern Scots conspiracy: pattern in the development of northern English. In Anderson, John M. & Jones, Charles (eds.) Historical linguistics II: theory and description in phonology. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 403–426.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (2002). The sociolinguistics of modern RP. In Trudgill, Peter. Sociolinguistic variation and change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 171–180.Google Scholar
Turk, Alice E. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie (2007). Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. JPh 35. 445–472.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert & Samuels, Bridget (2005). Laryngeal markedness and aspiration. Phonology 22. 395–436.Google Scholar
Vijayakrishnan, K. G. (2003). Weakening processes in the optimality framework. In van de Weijer, Jeroen M., van Heuven, Vincent J. & Hulst, Harry van der (eds.) The phonological spectrum. Vol. 1: Segmental structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Kevin (2007a). The phonetics and phonology of plosive lenition in Liverpool English. PhD dissertation, Edge Hill University & Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Watson, Kevin (2007b). Liverpool English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37. 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). The accents of English. Vol. 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar