Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T21:51:50.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gereon Müller (2020). Inflectional morphology in harmonic serialism. (Advances in Optimality Theory.) Sheffield & Bristol, CT: Equinox Publishing. Pp. x + 350.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2021

Itamar Kastner Open the ORCID record for Itamar Kastner [Opens in a new window]
Itamar Kastner*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
*
*E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , August 2021 , pp. 513 - 520
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks to Laura Kalin for comments on a previous draft.

References

Arad, Maya (2003). Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: the case of Hebrew denominal verbs. NLLT 21. 737–778.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark (1985). The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. LI 16. 373–415.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David (2012). Universals in comparative morphology: suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1973). Conditions on transformations. In Anderson, Stephen R. & Kiparsky, Paul (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 232–286.Google Scholar
Embick, David (2010). Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalin, Laura (2020). Infixes really are (underlyingly) prefixes/suffixes: evidence from allomorphy on the fine timing of infixation. Ms, Princeton University. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005581.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2007). Hidden generalizations: phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. Sheffield & Bristol, CT: Equinox.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2008). The serial interaction of stress and syncope. NLLT 26. 499–546.Google Scholar
Manova, Stela, Hammarström, Harald, Kastner, Itamar & Nie, Yining (2020). What is in a morpheme? Theoretical, experimental and computational approaches to the relation of meaning and form in morphology. Word Structure 13. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskal, Beata & Smith, Peter W. (2016). Towards a theory without adjacency: hyper-contextual VI-rules. Morphology 26. 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter (1988). Affix order and interpretation: Quechua. In Everaert, Martin, Evers, Arnold, Huybregts, Rini & Trommelen, Mieke (eds.) Morphology and modularity: in honour of Henk Schultink. Dordrecht: Foris. 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myler, Neil (2017). Exceptions to the Mirror Principle and morphophonological ‘action at a distance’: the role of ‘word’-internal phrasal movement and spell-out. In Newell, Heather, Noonan, Máire, Piggott, Glyne & Travis, Lisa deMena (eds.) The structure of words at the interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 100–125.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pross, Tillmann & Roßdeutscher, Antje (2019). Towards a correlation of form, use and meaning of German ge-prefixed predicative participles. Glossa 4(1):93. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren (2000). Morpheme order and semantic scope: word formation in the Athapaskan verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar