Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:32:22.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wittgenstein 1929–1931

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

H. D. P. Lee
Affiliation:
Hughes Hall, Cambridge

Extract

The following brief memoir of Wittgenstein needs a few preliminary words of explanation. Among those who attended his lectures and discussions in the years it covers was D. G. James, who later became Professor of English at Bristol University and then Vice-Chancellor of Southampton University. I met him both in Bristol and Southampton, and on one occasion suggested to him that some of us who had known Wittgenstein, but who had not become professional philosophers, might write down our recollections of him, and that he and I should start. What prompted the suggestion was, I think, the publication of Norman Malcolm's book, and a feeling that the non-professionals might have something to contribute to the assessment of Wittgenstein, particularly as a person. I wrote a preliminary draft and sent it to James; but he never responded, there was much else to do, I let the matter rest, and now James is dead. I wrote in about the year 1960 (my typescript bears no date) on holiday and away from any books of reference and from my own notes of Wittgenstein's lectures and conversations. I have shown the typescript to a few interested people, but because of its preliminary and unfinished nature have not previously thought of publication. It has recently been suggested to me that it might be of more general interest, and I publish it now as it was written, with one or two trifling alterations. I am well aware of its limitations. It was intended to give an impression of Wittgenstein as a person rather than as a philosopher, and the rather miscellaneous collection of remarks in section 3 have that in view rather than any more strictly ‘philosophical’ intention. Others may well question some of the detail and disagree with some of the opinions expressed. And there are some things which I might put rather differently today. But if the memoir has any interest it is best left as it was written.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 He used to come to meetings of the Moral Sciences Club but so dominated discussion that someone (I do not know who) complained, and when the complaint came to his ears (through Moore, I think) he ceased to attend meetings. Many of us much regretted this, feeling, I think, that we could spare listening to lesser men when there was a chance of hearing one of the major philosophers of the century. But it remains true that he did dominate any discussion in which he took part and inhibit others.