Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xq6d9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-13T01:01:38.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utility and the Survival Lottery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Peter Singer
Peter Singer
Affiliation:
Monash University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 52 , Issue 200 , April 1977 , pp. 218 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1977

References

1 Harris, John, ‘The Survival Lottery’, Philosophy 50 (1975), 81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

2 Ryan, Alan has suggested (though not necessarily endorsed) some of these objections in ‘Two Kinds of Morality’, The Hastings Center Report 5, no. 5 (1975), 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3 See, for instance, Bennett, Jonathan, ‘Whatever the Consequences’, Analysis 26 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tooley, Michael, ‘Abortion and Infanticide’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 2, no. 1 (1972)Google Scholar; and Glover, Jonathan's forthcoming book, Causing Death and Saving Lives.Google Scholar

4 Yudkin, John, Pure, White and Deadly: the Problem of Sugar (London: Davis-Poynter, 1972).Google Scholar

5 Lancet, 30 12 1972.Google Scholar

6 Mill, J. S., On Liberty (London: J. M. Dent, 1910), 75.Google Scholar