No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
Professors A. D. Ritchie (Philosophy, January 1957) and F. H. George (Philosophy, April 1957) both miss the question: What is the use of saying that machines think? Does the extension in the use of the word “think” to cover the complicated activity of modern machines (actual or possible in theory) enable us to explain better the nature of such activity? Extensions in usage are common and necessary in science.
1 S. Toulmin, Philosophy of Science, p. 22.