Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:33:20.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theories of Immortality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Extract

Those who have advocated belief in immortality have often spoiled their case by arguing for different theories without realizing that they were different. Those who have opposed the belief have been apt to think that when they had disposed of one theory they had done all they set out to do. The first condition for clarity of thought on the subject is therefore to distinguish the different types of theory which have been put forward. This is my primary aim in the following discussion. If, in the course of it, I speak more favourably of one theory and less favourably of others, it must be understood that this bias is incidental to my present theme, which is to examine assertions rather than to assert.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 118 note 1 Cf. Ellis, William, The Idea of the Soul, 1940Google Scholar.

page 119 note 1 Cf. Tyrrell, G. N. M., Science and Psychical Phenomena, 1938Google Scholar, and Price, Harry, Fifty Years of Psychical Research, 1939Google Scholar.