Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T08:47:41.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tears and Fiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Colin Radford
Colin Radford
Affiliation:
University of Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 52 , Issue 200 , April 1977 , pp. 208 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In ‘How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina?’, Proc. Arist. Soc., Suppl. Vol. (1975).Google Scholar

2 In Part One of his reply to my paper (ibid.).

3 Though how we can feel concern for her is yet another, related, problem. She cannot really suffer because she is fictional, we cannot be harmed because the monster is fictional.

4 The fact that we cannot so distance ourselves, or it is inappropriate to do this, when the events are real (and we know this) or the work is a history (and we know this) lends support to my thesis, and does not, pace Weston, show that it is a vulgar confusion to try to throw light on our responses to fiction by comparing them with our responses to history, news, or life itself.