No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Relevance of Whitehead1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Review Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1965
References
page 60 note 2 Bertrand, Russell, My Philosophical Development (London, 1959), p. 12.Google Scholar
page 61 note 1 Critique of Pure Reason, B 878 (Kemp-Smith's translation).Google Scholar
page 61 note 2 Cf. Max, Horkheimer, The Eclipse of Reason (O.U.P., 1947), and my ‘Objectivity and Reason’ in this Journal, Vol. 31, 1956.Google Scholar
page 63 note 1 Process and Reality, pp. 30-31.Google Scholar
page 64 note 1 Vide, Physics and Philosophy (London, 1959), pp. 60–68.Google Scholar
page 64 note 2 ‘Our Conception of Matter’ in What is Life and Other Scientific Essays (New York, 1956), p. 177.Google Scholar
page 64 note 3 Leclerc, , in his paper on ‘Form and Actuality’ in the volume under review (p. 171), makes brief reference to this concurrence.Google Scholar
page 66 note 1 Vide, Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge, 1958), Chs. I and II.Google Scholar