Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:18:32.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-enchanting the World: The Role of Imagination in Perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2010

K. Lennon
K. Lennon*
Affiliation:
University of Hull
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper defends what the philosopher Merleau Ponty coins ‘the imaginary texture of the real’. It is suggested that the imagination is at work in the everyday world which we perceive, the world as it is for us. In defending this view a concept of the imagination is invoked which has both similarities with and differences from, our everyday notion. The everyday notion contrasts the imaginary and the real. The imaginary is tied to the fictional or the illusory. Here it will be suggested, following both Kant and Strawson, that there is a more fundamental working of the imagination, present in both perception and the constructions of fictions. What Kant and Strawson failed to make clear, however, was that the workings of the imagination within the perceived world, gives that world, an affective logic. The domain of affect is that of emotions, feelings and desire, and to claim such an affective logic in the world we experience, is to point out that it has salience and significance for us. Such salience suggests and demands the desiring and sometimes fearful responses we make to it; the shape of the perceived world echoed in the shapes our bodies take within it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 375 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Weber, Max, Essays in Sociology (Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright (trans. and ed.), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1948), 139Google Scholar.

2 Ibid., 142.

3 Ponty, M. MerleauThe Phenomenology of Perception (trans. Smith, Colin, London: Routledge, 1962).Google Scholar

4 Physiognomy : The face, especially, viewed as an index of … character. Also the contour of a country Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970).

5 Kenny, A. (ed.) The Wittgenstein Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), 221Google Scholar.

6 Wittgenstein, L., Zettel, (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967), 225Google Scholar.

7 Zettel, 533 and 534.

8 McDowell, JohnMind, Value and Reality (Harvard University Press: Cambridge and London, 1998), 86Google Scholar.

9 Ponty, M. Merleau, Phenomenology of Perception (London, Routledge, 1962), 197.Google Scholar

10 Heidegger, M.Introduction to Metaphysics (trans. Mannheim, RalphNew Haven (Connn): Yale U.P., 1959) 27–8Google Scholar.

11 Rose, M. ‘Gathering Dreams of Presence’ Environment and Planning 24, 2006, 548Google Scholar.

12 Ponty, Merleau, Eye and Mind, in Phenomenology, Language and Sociology, (O'Neill, J. (ed.), Heinemann, London, 1974), 285Google Scholar.

13 Sartre, J. P., The Imaginary (Webber, J. (trans.), London: Routledge, 2004), 7Google Scholar.

14 Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason (Smith, N. Kemp (trans.), LondonMacmillan, 1929), A 120Google Scholar.

15 Strawson, P., ‘Imagination and Perception’ in Strawson, P., Freedom and Resentment (London, Methuen, 1974Google Scholar).

16 Sartre, J. P., The Imaginary (Webber, J. (trans.), London and New York, Routledge, 2004), 25ffGoogle Scholar.

17 P. Strawson, ‘Imagination and Perception’, 95.

18 Ibid., 89.

19 Ponty, M. Merleau, The Visible and the Invisible (Lingis, Alphonso (trans.), North Western University Press, 1968), xlvGoogle Scholar.

20 Ibid., 132.

21 Ibid., 229–230.

22 Hume, D., Treatise of Human Nature, (Selby Bigge, L. A. (trans.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1888), part III, section 6Google Scholar.

23 See, for example, Freud, S., ‘Notes on a Case of Obsessional Neuroses’, in The Standard Edition of the Collected Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Strachey, J. (trans.), Hogarth Press 1974), vol. X, 153ff.Google Scholar

24 Lacan, J., ‘The Mirror stage as Formative of the “I”, in Lacan, J., Escrits: A Selection, (Sheridan, A. (trans.), Norton, 1977)Google Scholar.

25 Castoriadis, C., ‘Radical Imagination and the Social Instituting Imaginary’, in Robinson, G. and Rundell, J. (eds.), Rethinking Imagination, (London: Routledge, 1994), 150Google Scholar.

26 Irigaray, L., This Sex Which is Not One, Porter, C. with Burke, C. (trans.), (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985), 73Google Scholar.

27 McDowell, John, Mind, Value and Reality (Harvard University Press: Cambridge and London, 1998), 144Google Scholar.

28 Merleau Ponty, Eye and Mind, 296.

29 M. Heidegger, Introduction to Metaphysics, 27–8.

30 Sartre, J. P., Being and Nothingness (Barnes, H. (trans.), Routledge: London, 1969), 392Google Scholar.

31 Merleau Ponty, Eye and Mind, 300.

32 Lloyd, G., ‘Spinoza and the Education of the Imagination’ in Rorty, A. (ed.) Philosophers and Education, (London, Routledge, 1998), 162Google Scholar.

33 Lloyd, G. and Gatens, M. (ed.) Collective Imaginings (London and New York: Routledge, 1999), 26Google Scholar.

34 Collective Imaginings, 142. See also Gilbert, P. and Lennon, K.The World the Flesh and the Subject (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005Google Scholar), chapter 3; where this example is also discussed.

35 McDowell, John, Mind and World, (Harvard University Press: Cambridge and London, 1996) 85Google Scholar.

36 Latour, B., We have Never been Modern (Porter, C. (trans.), Brighton: Harvester, 1993) 23Google Scholar.

37 Rouse, J., ‘Merleau Ponty's Existential Conception of Science’ in the Cambridge Companion to Merleau Ponty, (Carman, T. and Hansen, M. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2005), 280Google Scholar.

38 Merleau Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible, 215.