No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Recent Trends in Ethical Thought
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
Extract
In my book, A Hundred Years of British Philosophy, in connection with Cook Wilson and his Oxford followers I briefly mentioned a new line of ethical research that has made its mark within the last decade. Its representatives are differently labelled, as “Oxford Moralists,” “Intuitionists,” “Neo-Intuitionists,” “Objectivists,” and with other names as well. But I could not give more than a few very insufficient hints about the new school: a fuller treatment would have exceeded the compass of my book, and, further, at the time the book was written, things were not settled enough to be made the subject of a historical review. Even now the time has hardly come for a final appreciation. Nevertheless, the discussion is so far advanced that it may be worth while to take stock of it in order to exhibit not only the new tendency itself, but also the various cross-currents which have been called forth by its appearance. Such an attempt is greatly furthered by the fact that some preliminary work has already been done in this direction by writers who have taken part in the discussion.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1939
References
page 299 note 1 1935, English edition, 1938, p. 527 ff.
page 299 note 2 Principia Ethica (1903) and Ethics (1912)
page 301 note 1 Published in Mind, 1912.
page 302 note 1 Published in Mind, 1903.
page 302 note 2 The Theory of Morals (1928).
page 306 note 1 Published in Philosophy, vols. v and vi (1930 and 1931).Google Scholar
page 306 note 2 Recently published From Morality to Religion (1938), which appeared too late for me to make use of it.
page 306 note 3 Vide, Philosophy, vol. vi, p. 232.Google Scholar
page 307 note 1 Published in Mind, vol. 41 (1932).Google Scholar
page 308 note 1 Philosophy, vol. vii (1932).Google Scholar
page 308 note 2 Mind, vol. 42 (1933).Google Scholar
page 308 note 3 Mind, vol. 41 (1932).Google Scholar
page 311 note 1 Mind, vol. 44 (1935).Google Scholar