Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:19:37.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prior's ‘Thank Goodness’ Argument: A Reply to Hardin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Delmas Lewis
Delmas Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 61 , Issue 237 , July 1986 , pp. 404 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Prior, A. N., ‘Thank Goodness That's Over’, Philosophy 34, No. 128 (01 1959), 12–17.Google Scholar

2 Hardin, C. L., ‘Thank Goodness It's Over There’, Philosophy 59, No. 227 (01 1984), 121–125, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Prior, A. N., ‘The Formalities of Ominiscience’, Philosophy 37, No. 140 (04 1962), 114–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Prior, ‘The Formalities of Omniscience’, 116.