Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:42:55.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Plea for the Supererogatory: A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Elizabeth M. Pybus
Elizabeth M. Pybus
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 61 , Issue 238 , October 1986 , pp. 526 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 McGoldrick, Patricia M., ‘Saints and Heroes: A Plea for the Supereroga-tory’,Philosophy 59, No. 230 (October 1984), 523–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Ibid., 527.

3 Pybus, Elizabeth M., ‘Saints and Heroes’, Philosophy 57, No. 220 (1982), 193–199, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 McGoldrick, ‘Saints and Heroes …’, 524.

5 Pybus, Elizabeth M., ‘False Dichotomies: Right and Good’, Philosophy 58 (1983), 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 McGoldrick, 525.

7 I do not intend to imply a sharp distinction between virtues as, say, techniques, and the ends at which virtuous moral agents aim. For instance, to help others I may need to be benevolent, but I cannot be benevolent unless the good of others is at least sometimes my aim.

8 McGoldrick, 526.

9 Ibid., 527.

10 Ibid., 527.