Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T03:23:57.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paradox, Confirmation and Inquiry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Paul T. Sagal
Paul T. Sagal
Affiliation:
New Mexico State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 51 , Issue 198 , October 1976 , pp. 467 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quine, W. V., The Ways of Paradox (Random House, 1966)Google Scholar.

2 Quine, W. V., ‘Natural Kinds’, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (Columbia University Press, 1969)Google Scholar.

3 This is not Goodman's way of defining ‘grue’. The above definition suffices for our purposes.

4 Normal sets are sets whose members are not members of themselves.

5 Quine, W. V., ‘Natural Kinds’, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, 128–129Google Scholar.