Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:20:50.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Ought-lmplies-Can’ and Hume's Rule

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

D. G. Collingridge
D. G. Collingridge
Affiliation:
University of Aston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 52 , Issue 201 , July 1977 , pp. 348 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for example, Hare, R. M., Freedom and Reason (Oxford, 1963), 59–60Google Scholar, and Hampshire, S., ‘Freedom of the Will’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 25 (1951), 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Nowell-Smith, P., Ethics (Pelican, 1954), 80–81.Google Scholar

3 Cooper, N., ‘Presuppositions of Moral Judgements’, Mind, 75 (1966), 46.Google Scholar See also Hampshire, S., op. cit.Google Scholar

4 Hampshire, S., op. cit., 164.Google Scholar

5 Hare, R. M., op. cit., 84.Google Scholar