Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:38:20.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Wanting to Compare Wittgenstein and Zen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

D. Z. Phillips
D. Z. Phillips
Affiliation:
University College of Swansea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 52 , Issue 201 , July 1977 , pp. 338 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Canfield, John V., ‘Wittgenstein and Zen’, Philosophy 50, No. 194, (10 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Philip Kapleau (Boston, 1965), 231–232. Quoted by Canfield on p. 392.

3 Bouwsma, O. K., ‘Anselm's Argument’ in The Nature of Philosophical Enquiry, Bobik, J. (ed.) (University of Notre Dame Press, 1970).Google Scholar

4 Trans. Watson, Burton, The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu (New York, 1968).Google Scholar

5 I owe this suggestion to a valuable conversation on this topic with Glyn Richards. No doubt the spiritual orientation of the dialectic would pose similar difficulties to those raised in this paper.

6 Sinyavsky, Andrey, Unguarded Thoughts, trans. Harari, M. (Collins, 1972).Google Scholar