Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:32:29.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Liberty and the Real Will

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

J. P. Day
J. P. Day
Affiliation:
Keele University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Introduction. In the chapter which he devotes to the applications of his principle of individual liberty, Mill considers the question ‘how far liberty may legitimately be invaded for the prevention of crime, or of accident’. On the latter topic, he writes:—‘… it is a proper office of public authority to guard against accidents. If either a public officer or anyone else saw a person attempting to cross a bridge which had been ascertained to be unsafe, and there were no time to warn him of his danger, they might seize him and turn him back, without any real infringement of his liberty; for liberty consists in doing what one desires, and he does not desire to fall into the river.” (Q1)

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 45 , Issue 173 , July 1970 , pp. 177 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mill, J. S., On Liberty, ch. V.Google Scholar

2 Bosanquet, B., The Philosophical Theory of the State, London, 1899, p. 110.Google Scholar

3 Barry, B., Political Argument, London, 1965, pp. 176ff.Google Scholar

4 Rabelais, F., La Vie tres Horrifique du Grand Gargantua, ch. LVII.Google Scholar

5 Ezorsky, G., ‘Wishing Won't—but Wanting Will’, in Hook, S. (ed.), Dimensions of Mind, New York, 1960.Google Scholar

6 Skinner, B. F., ‘Concept-formation in Philosophy and Psychology’, in Hook, loc. cit.Google Scholar

7 Austin, Jean, ‘Pleasure and Happiness’, repr. in Schneewind, J. B. (ed.), Mill, New York, 1968, p. 235.Google Scholar

8 Austin, J. L., Sense and Sensibilia, Oxford, 1962, ch. VII.Google Scholar Cp: ‘… for us anything, which comes short when compared with Reality, gets the name of appearance.’ (Bradley, F. H., Appearance and Reality, London, 1899, p. 485.)Google Scholar

9 Cranston, M., Freedom: a New Analysis, London, 1953, p. 15.Google ScholarWeinstein, W. L., ‘The Concept of Liberty in 19th Century English Political Thought’, Political Studies, Vol. XIII, Oxford, 1965.Google Scholar

10 Plamenatz, J. P., Consent, Freedom and Political Obligation, Oxford, 1938, pp. 109ff.Google Scholar

11 Hobbes, T., LeviathanGoogle Scholar, Pt. II, ch. XXI, Carritt, E. F., ‘Liberty and Equality’, Law Quarterly Review, Vol. LVI, 1940.Google Scholar

12 Mabbott, J. D., The State and the Citizen, London, 1947, p. 70.Google Scholar

13 Berlin, I., ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’, repr. in Quinto, A.. (ed.), Political Philosophy, Oxford, 1967, p. 142.Google ScholarPlamenatz, , loc. cit., pp. 110ff.Google Scholar

14 Berlin, , loc. cit.Google ScholarPlamenatz, , loc. cit.Google Scholar

15 Plamenatz, , loc. cit., chs. II, III.Google ScholarMayo, B., ‘Is there a case for the General Will?’ in Laslett, P. (ed.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, Oxford, 1956.Google Scholar

16 Berlin, , loc. cit., p. 197, Note 1.Google Scholar

17 Austin, Jean, loc. cit., p. 238.Google Scholar

18 Benn, S. I. and Peters, R. S., Social Principles and the Democratic State, London, 1959, p. 213, Note.Google Scholar

19 Rousseau, J. J., Social Contract, Bk. I, ch. VII.Google Scholar

20 Kenny, A., Action, Emotion and Will, London, 1963, p. 127.Google Scholar

21 Daniel, V, 27.Google Scholar

22 Peters, R. S., The Concept of Motivation, London, 1958, pp. 17f.Google ScholarBenn, and Peters, , loc. cit., pp. 142ff.Google Scholar

23 Peters, , loc. cit., p. 128.Google ScholarActon, H. B., The Illusion of the Epoch, London, 1955, pp. 112ff.Google Scholar

24 Letters from the Mountain, No. VIII.

25 Social Contract, Bk. I, ch. VIII.

26 Hegel, G. W. F., Philosophy of Right, tr. Knox, T. M., Oxford, 1942, p. 27.Google ScholarPlamenatz, , loc. cit, pp. 109f.Google Scholar

27 Ryle, G., The Concept of Mind, London, 1949, p. 109.Google Scholar

28 McGuinness, B. F., ‘I know what I want’, Aristotelian Society Proceedings, Vol. LVII, London, 1957.Google Scholar

29 Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words, Oxford, 1962, pp. 99ff.Google Scholar

30 Toulmin, S. E., ‘Concept-Formation in Philosophy and Psychology’Google Scholar, in Hook, , loc. cit.Google Scholar

31 Abelson, R., ‘A Spade is a Spade, so Mind your Language’Google Scholar, in Hook, , loc. cit.Google Scholar

32 Principles of Political Economy, 7th ed., Bk. V, ch. XI, sees. 7–12.Google Scholar

33 Clay, H., Economics, London, 1916, chs. XXI, XXII.Google Scholar

34 Representative Government, ch. III.

35 Weinstein, , loc. cit., pp. 148f.Google Scholar

36 Political Economy, Bk. V, ch. XI, sec 12.Google Scholar

37 Plamenatz, , Man and Society, Vol. II, London, 1963, p. 30.Google Scholar

38 Bambrough, R., ‘Plato's Political Analogies’Google Scholar, in Laslett, , loc. cit.Google Scholar He refers in particular to the Gorgias and Politicus.

39 Social Contract, Bk. II, ch. VI.

40 Hegel, , loc. cit., p. 295.Google Scholar Cp: ‘It was not an abstract greatness (Hegel) admired in Napoleon, but the quality of expressing the historical need of the time. (Marcuse, H., Reason and Revolution, London, 1941, pp. 169f.)Google Scholar

41 Cp: ‘Since the proletarian dictatorship is the dispossession and the suppression of the capitalists, it is also the end of exploitation. We might almost say that exploitation is defined out of the social order through the dictatorship of the proletariat.’ (Acton, , loc. cit., p. 244.Google Scholar) Weldon, T. D., The Vocabulary of Politics, London, 1953, pp. 130f.Google Scholar

42 Hobhouse, L. T., The Metaphysical Theory of the State, London, 1918, p. 6.Google Scholar

43 Popper, K. R., The Poverty of Historicism, London, 1957.Google Scholar

44 Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford, 1969, pp. xxxviiff. Cp. pp. 135ff.Google Scholar

45 Epictetus, , Discourses, tr. Matheson, P. E., Oxford, 1916, Bk. IV, ch. I.Google Scholar