¹ Chesterton, G. K., Orthodoxy (London: Collins, 1961), 12.Google Scholar

² See Putnam, H., Realism with a Human Face (Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Renewing Philosophy (Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1992); Words & Life (Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1994) and Pragmatism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994)

³ ‘Sense, Nonsense and the Senses: An Inquiry Into the Powers of the Human Mind’, Journal of Philosophy XCI, September 1994, 445–517.

⁴ See Reason, Truth and History (Cambridge University Press, 1981).

⁵ ‘Sense, Nonsense and the Senses’, 447 & 465.

⁶ ‘Sense, Nonsense and the Senses’, 461; this being a gloss of the view presented in the preface to Realism with a Human Face.

⁷ ‘Sense, Nonsense and the Senses’, 502–517.

⁸ Reprinted in Meaning and the Moral Sciences (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978), 123–140.

⁹ See: Haldane, J., ‘Brentano's Problem’, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 35, 1989, 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Reid, Scholasticism and Current Philosophy of Mind’, in Dalgarno, M. & Matthews, E. (eds) The Philosophy of Thomas Reid (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1989), 285–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Putnam of Intentionality’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1991, 671–682; ‘Mind-World Identity Theory and the Anti-Realist Challenge’ in Haldane, J & Wright, C. (eds) Reality, Representation and Projection (New York: OUP, 1993), 15–37Google Scholar; ‘Whose Theory? Which Representations?’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 74, 1993, 247–257; and ‘The Forms of Thought’in Hahn, L., (ed.) The Philosophy of Roderick Chisholm, Library of Living Philosophers (La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, forthcoming).Google Scholar

¹⁰ See ‘Aristotle after Wittgenstein’ in Sharpies, R. W. (ed.) Modern Thinkers and Ancient Thinkers (London: UCL Press, 1993), 117–137;reprinted in Words & Life.Google Scholar

¹¹ Haldane, J., ‘Humanism with a Realist Face’, PhilosophicalBooks, 35, 1994, 21–29.Google Scholar

¹² Summa Theologiae, IIa, IIae, q.8, a. 1, responsio. Adapted from the literal translation by Fathers of the English Dominican Province (London: R. & T. Washbourne, Ltd., 1916), 95.

¹³ Summa Theologiae, Ia, q. 85, a. 2. Adapted from the literal translation by Fathers of the English Dominican Province (London: R. & T.Washbourne, Ltd., 1912), 184.

¹⁴ On which see McDowell, John, Mind and World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994)— work that has had a marked, and acknowledged, influence on Putnam's recent thinking.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Chesterton, G. K., St Thomas Aquinas, (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1933), 171–172.Google Scholar

¹⁶ See, for example, ‘Sense, Nonsense and the Senses’, 447, fn.4

¹⁷ ‘Sense, Nonsense and the Senses’, 450–451.

¹⁸ See, for example, Quaestiones Disputatae de Veritate, q. 1, a. 1.

¹⁹ Though ultimately I do not believe that one can, and hence hold that all substances are artefacts—God is not a substance. See ‘Theism’ in Smart, J. J. C. and Haldane, J., Atheism and Theism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).Google Scholar

²⁰ See, for example, Summa Theologiae, Ia, q. 13, 1–6. For an account of the idea see Mclnerny, Ralph, The Logic of Analogy (The Hague:Nijhoff, 1961) and more recently ‘Aquinas and Analogy: Where Cajetan Went Wrong’, Philosophical Topics, 20, 1992, 103–124.Google Scholar

²¹ See Kenny, A., ‘Aquinas and Wittgenstein’, Downside Review, Vol. 77, 1959,CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Chapman, T., ‘Analogy’, The Thomist, Vol. 39, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²² For further elaboration and defence of this idea see my ‘Mind-World Identity Theory and the Anti-Realist Challenge’ and ‘The Forms of Thought’.