Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:20:38.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natural Goodness, Sex, and the Perverted Faculty Argument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2021

Christopher Arroyo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is a longstanding and widely held view, often associated with Catholicism, that intrinsically nonprocreative human sex acts are intrinsically immoral. Some philosophers who hold this view, such as Edward Feser, claim that they can defend the view on purely philosophical grounds by relying on the perverted faculty argument. This paper argues that Feser's defense of the perverted faculty argument does not work because Feser fails to recognize the full implications of the species-dependence of natural goodness. By drawing on the work of Peter Geach and Philippa Foot, this paper presents a view of natural goodness that adequately accounts for the species-dependence of such goodness. Using this adequate account, the paper argues that at least some intrinsically nonprocreative human sex acts contribute to human flourishing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 97 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 115 - 142
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Philosophy.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous, ‘ONANIA; OR THE Heinous Sin OF Self-Pollution, AND All its Frightful Consequences, in both SEXES, Considered’ (Ann Arbor, MI: Text-Creation Partnership), https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/evans/N02163.0001.001/1:3?rgn=div1;view=toc. Accessed August 25, 2020.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. On Evil., trans. Regan, Richard, ed. with an Introduction and Notes by Brian Davies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Anscombe, G.E.M., ‘Contraception and Chastity’ in Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy, and Ethics, ed. Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke (Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2017), pp. 232–58.Google Scholar
Corvino, John, What's Wrong with Homosexuality? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Crooks, Robert and Bauer, Karla, Our Sexuality, 13th edition (Boston: Cengage Learning, 2016).Google Scholar
Davidson, Kenneth J. and Moore, Nelwyn B., ‘Masturbation and Premarital Sexual Intercourse Among College Women: Making Choices for Sexual Fulfillment’, Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 20.3 (1994), pp. 178–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francoeur, Robert T., Becoming a Sexual Person (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1991).Google Scholar
Feser, Edward, Aquinas: A Beginner's Guide (London: Oneworld Publications, 2009).Google Scholar
Feser, Edward, ‘Teleology: A Shopper's Guide’, Philosophia Christi 12.1 (2010), 142–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feser, Edward, Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction ((Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, Germany: Editiones-Scholasticae, 2014).Google Scholar
Feser, Edward, ‘In Defense of the Perverted Faculty Argument’, in Neo-Scholastic Essays (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine Press, 2015), pp. 378–415.Google Scholar
Feser, Edward, Aristotle's Revenge: The Metaphysical Foundations of Physical and Biological Sciences (Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, Germany: Editiones-Scholasticae, 2019a).Google Scholar
Feser, Edward, ‘Natural Law Ethics and the Revival of Aristotelian Metaphysics’, in The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Ethics, ed. Angier, Tom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019b).Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa, Natural Goodness (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa, ‘Rationality and Goodness’, in Modern Moral Philosophy, ed. O'Hear, Anthony (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Geach, P.T., ‘Good and Evil’, Analysis 17.2 (1956), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, Timothy, ‘A Defense of the Perverted Faculty Argument Against Homosexual Sex’, The Heythrop Journal 56.5 (2015), 751–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, Timothy, ‘Consenting Adults, Sex, and Natural Law Theory’ Philosophia 44.2 (2016), 509–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, Timothy, ‘The Perverted Faculty Argument’, Philosophia Christi 19.1 (2017), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbert, David F. and Whittaker, Karen E., ‘The Role of Masturbation in Marital and Sexual Satisfaction: A Comparative Study of Female Masturbators and Nonmasturbators’, Journal of Sex Education and Therapy 17.4 (1991), pp. 272–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, Herbert, Faith within Reason, ed. Davies, Brian (London and New York: Continuum, 2007).Google Scholar
Moore, Gareth, The Body in Context: Sex and Catholicism (London and New York: Continuum, 1992).Google Scholar
Paul, VI, Humanae Vitae (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1968) http://www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae.html.Google Scholar
Phipps, William E., ‘Masturbation: Vice or Virtue?’, Journal of Religion and Health 16.3 (1977), pp. 183–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Primoratz, Igor, ‘Sexual Morality: Is Consent Enough?’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (2001), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rind, Miles and Tillinghast, Lauren, ‘What is an Attributive Adjective?’, Philosophy 83 (2008), pp. 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, Edward L., The Joy of Self-Pleasuring (New York: Prometheus Books, 2000).Google Scholar
Singy, Patrick, ‘Friction of the Genitals and Secularization of Morality’, Journal of the History of Sexuality 12.3 (2003), 345–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skalko, John, Disordered Actions: A Moral Analysis of Lying and Homosexual Activity (Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, Germany: Editiones-Scholasticae, 2019).Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael, ‘The Representation of Life’, in Virtues and Reasons, ed. Hursthouse, Rosalind, Lawrence, Gavin, and Quinn, Warren (Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1995), pp. 247–97.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael, Life and Action: Elementary Structures in Practice and Practical Thought (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tissot, Samuel Auguste, Diseases Caused by Masturbation (New York and Philadelphia: Gottfried and Fritz, 2015 [1760]).Google Scholar