Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:39:43.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Locke and Natural Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

J. J. Jenkins
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 150 note 1 Loc. cit., par. 19.

page 150 note 2 Loc. cit.

page 150 note 3 Edition of the Second Treatise and A Letter Concerning Toleration, by Gough, J. W.. (Basil Blackwell, 1946), p. 152.Google Scholar

page 150 note 4 Second Treatise, par. 21. It is perhaps significant that the passage in which this quotation occurs was deleted from one state of the first edition of the Two Treatises. See Laslett, Peter, John Locke: Two Treatises of Government. (Cambridge, 1963), p. 300, footnote to par. 21. See also, by the same author, ‘The 1960 Edition of Locke's Two Treatises of Government’ in Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society (1952).Google Scholar

page 150 note 5 Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation, p. 80, par. 65.

page 151 note 1 Second Treatise, Chapter II, par. 8.

page 152 note 1 Leviathan, Chapter XIII.

page 152 note 2 Second Treatise, op. cit., par. 19.

page 152 note 3 Second Treatise, Chapter IX, par. 123.

page 153 note 1 Yet the most reputable of commentators continue so to defend him. See, for example, Benn, S. I. and Peters, R. S.: Social Principles and the Democratic State (George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1959), p. 97 ff.Google Scholar

page 153 note 2 See John Locke: Essays on the Law of Nature, ed. von Leyden, W. (Oxford, 1954).Google Scholar

page 154 note 1 Op. cit., p. 151.

page 154 note 2 Op. cit., p. 163.

page 154 note 3 Op. cit., p. 167.

page 154 note 4 Op. cit., p. 177.

page 154 note 5 Op. cit., p. 80—a view cautiously implied rather than asserted explicitly.