Article contents
Kant's Treatment of Animals
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
Extract
Some of the greatest writers on moral philosophy have claimed that their theories about morality do not run counter to the moral views of ordinary men, but on the contrary are an elucidation of such views, or provide them with a sound philosophical underpinning. Aristotle, for example, made it quite clear that he could not take seriously a moral view that was at odds with the heritage of moral wisdom deeply imbedded in his society. His doctrine of the mean was based on a philosophical consideration of such wisdom. And Immanuel Kant thought that his moral philosophy articulated the moral views of ordinary men.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1974
References
1 For a detailed discussion of this proposition see: Broadie, A. and Pybus, E. M., ‘Kant's Concept of Respect’, Kant-Studien, forthcoming.Google Scholar
2 Paton, H. J., The Moral Law (London: Hutchinson 1966), pp. 90–91.Google Scholar
3 Ibid p. 91.
4 Paton, , op cit., p. 132, 66 n. 2.Google Scholar
5 The Doctrine of Virtue, tr. Gregor, M. J. (Harper Torchbooks, 1964), p. 108.Google Scholar
6 Lectures on Ethics, tr. Infield, L. (Harper Torchbooks, 1963), pp. 239–240.Google Scholar
7 p. 109. Our italics.
8 The Doctrine of Virtue, p. 109.Google Scholar
9 p. 108.
10 Paton, , op. cit., p. 91.Google Scholar
11 Paton, , op. cit., p. 240.Google Scholar
12 Ibid., p. 240.
13 p. 109.
14 p. 109.
15 Lectures on Ethics, p. 240.Google Scholar
16 Paton, , op. cit., p. 76.Google Scholar
- 24
- Cited by