Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:19:28.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How the Rich Take their Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Margaret Coady
Margaret Coady
Affiliation:
State College of Victoria, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 56 , Issue 215 , January 1981 , pp. 114 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Williams, Bernard, ‘The Idea of Equality’, Philosophy, Politics and Society, 2nd series, Laslett, P. and Runciman, W. G. (eds) (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1962), 110–131Google Scholar. One well-known but very brief criticism of Williams is that by Nozick, Robert in Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974)Google Scholar.

2 Ward, Andrew, ‘The Idea of Equality Reconsidered’, Philosophy 48, No. 183 (01 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Williams, op. cit., 121.

4 Ward, Andrew, ‘The Penalties for Being Rich’, Philosophy 53, No. 205 (07 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Coady, Margaret M., ‘Considering Equality’, Philosophy 50, No. 192 (04 1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 ‘The Penalties for Being Rich’, op. cit., 387.

7 Childress, James F., ‘Who Shall Live When Not All Can Live?’, Soundings, LIII (Winter, 1970), 143–153Google Scholar.

8 Ibid., 149.