Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:44:35.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Form in Aristotle: Universal or Particular?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

R. D. Sykes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper I ask whether in Aristotle's metaphysical system the form of a non-living sensible substance, such as the form of this house, is or is not universal. I argue that his position as it stands is self-contradictory, and then try to give some account of the pressures that led to this central contradiction in Aristotle's metaphysical thought.

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 50 , Issue 193 , July 1975 , pp. 311 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albritton, R., ‘The Forms of Particular Substances in Aristotle's Metaphysics’, The Journal of Philosophy 1957, pp. 699–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, A. R., οὐσα. and Form in Aristotle', Phronesis 1965, pp. 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, M. J., ‘Problems in Metaphysics Z, Chapter 13’, Aristotle, edited by Moravcsik, J. M. E. (Doubleday, Anchor Books, New York, 1967), pp. 215–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copleston, F. C., A History of Philosophy, Vol. I, Part II (Doubleday Image Books, New York, 1962).Google Scholar
Owens, J., The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics, Second Printing (Toronto, 1957).Google Scholar
Ross, W. D., Aristotle's Metaphysics (Oxford, 1924).Google Scholar
Zeller, E., Aristotle and the Earlier Peripatetics, translated by Costelloe, B. F. C. and Muirhead, J. H., 2 vols. (London, 1897).Google Scholar