Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:20:01.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fairness, Utility and Survival

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Richard L. Trammell  and
Thomas E. Wren
Richard L. Trammell
Affiliation:
Grove City College
Thomas E. Wren
Affiliation:
Loyola University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 52 , Issue 201 , July 1977 , pp. 331 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Philosophy 50, No. 191 (07 1975). 81–87.Google Scholar

2 Or as Robert Nozick puts it in a related context, we need to consider such questions in spite of their sounding ‘slightly hysterical’. Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974), 206.Google Scholar

3 But see Trammell's, Richard L. article, ‘Saving Life and Taking Life’, Journal of Philosophy 72, No. 5 (13 03 1975), 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Like most others who cite it, Harris ignores the bitterly ironic context in which Clough's famous line appears:

Thou shalt not kill; but need'st not strive

Officiously to keep alive.

Do not adultery commit;

Advantage rarely comes of it;

Thou shalt not steal; an empty feat,

When it's so lucrative to cheat:…

The Latest Decalogue

5 Cf. Barry, Brian, Political Argument (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1965), Ch. 6Google Scholar, and Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971), 85–86.Google Scholar

6 Does Harris realize what Y and Z are really up to here? Apparently not, for he writes, ‘The problem of narrowing down the class of possible donors without discriminating unfairly against some sub-class of society is, I suspect, insoluble’ (p. 86).