Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:47:18.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expert Knowledge by Perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2020

Madeleine Ransom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Does the scope of beliefs that people can form on the basis of perception remain fixed, or can it be amplified with learning? The answer to this question is important for our understanding of why and when we ought to trust experts, and also for assessing the plausibility of epistemic foundationalism. The empirical study of perceptual expertise suggests that experts can indeed enrich their perceptual experiences through learning. Yet this does not settle the epistemic status of their beliefs. One might hold that the background knowledge of experts is the cause of their enriched perceptual experience – what is known as cognitive permeation – and so their subsequent beliefs are only mediately justified because they are epistemically dependent on this background knowledge. I argue against this view. Perceptual expertise is not the result of cognitive permeation but is rather the result of perceptual learning, and perceptual learning does not involve cognition in a way that entails cognitive permeation. Perceptual expertise thus provides a means of widening the scope of the immediately justified beliefs that experts can form.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 95 , Issue 3 , July 2020 , pp. 309 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, William P., ‘What's Wrong with Immediate Knowledge?’, Synthese, 55 (1983): 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, K.M., ‘Covert Spatial Attention and Saccade Planning’, In Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, edited by Mole, Christopher, Smithies, Declan, and Wu, Wayne, (New York: OUP, 2011, 78–96).Google Scholar
Ball, Karlene and Sekuler, Robert, ‘A Specific and Enduring Improvement in Visual Motion Discrimination’, Science 218 (1982), 697–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bilalic, Merim, Grottenthaler, Thomas, Nagele, Thomas, and Lindig, Tobias, ‘The Faces in Radiological Images: Fusiform Face Area Supports Radiological Expertise’, Cerebral Cortex 26 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonjour, Laurence, ‘Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation?’ American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1978), 1–13.Google Scholar
Brewer, Bill, Perception and Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Briscoe, Robert, ‘Cognitive Penetration and the Reach of Phenomenal Content’, In The Cognitive Penetrability of Perception, edited by Zeimbekis, John and Raftopoulos, Athanassios, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 174–203).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brogaard, Berit and Chomanski, Bartek, ‘Cognitive Penetrability and High-Level Properties in Perception: Unrelated Phenomena?’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 96 (2015), 469–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brogaard, Berit and Gatzia, Dimitria Electra, ‘The Real Epistemic Significance of Perceptual Learning’, Inquiry 61 (2018), 543–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrasco, Marisa, ‘Visual Attention: The Past 25 Years’, Vision Research, 51 (2011), 1484–1525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomanski, Bartek and Chudnoff, Elijah, ‘How Perception Generates, Preserves, and Mediates Justification’, Inquiry 61 (2018), 559–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudnoff, Elijah, ‘The Epistemic Significance of Perceptual Learning’, Inquiry 61 (2018), 520–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, Paul M., Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, Paul M., 1988. “Perceptual Plasticity and Theoretical Neutrality: A Reply to Jerry Fodor.” Philosophy of Science 55 (2): 167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, Kevin, Perceptual Learning: The Flexibility of the Senses, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).10.1093/oso/9780190662899.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desimone, Robert, ‘Visual Attention Mediated by Biased Competition in Extrastriate Visual Cortex’, Edited by Humphreys, G. W., Duncan, J., and Treisman, A.. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 353 (1998), 1245–55.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred I, Knowledge and the Flow of Information (MIT Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Easton, Suzanne, An Introduction to Radiography, (Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, 2009).Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A., ‘A Reply to Churchland's ‘Perceptual Plasticity and Theoretical Neutrality’, Philosophy of Science, 55 (1988), 188–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, Isabel and Tarr, Michael J., ‘Becoming a ‘Greeble’ Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition’, Vision Research 37 (1997), 1673–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, Isabel, Williams, Pepper, Tarr, Michael J., and Tanaka, James. 1998. “Training ‘Greeble’ Experts: A Framework for Studying Expert Object Recognition Processes.” Vision Research 38 (15–16): 2401–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, James and Gibson, Eleanor J., ‘Perceptual Learning: Differentiation or Enrichment?’, Psychological Review, 62 (1955), 32–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman, Alvin I, ‘Immediate Justification and Process Reliabilism’, In Epistemology: New Essays, edited by Smith, Quentin, (Oxford: OUP, 2008, 63–82).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, Robert L., ‘Perceptual Learning’, Annual Review of Psychology 49 (1998), 585–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstone, Robert L. and Byrge, Lisa A., ‘Perceptual Learning’ In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception, edited by Matthen, Mohan, (Oxford: OUP, 2015, 812–32).Google Scholar
Goldstone, Robert L., Landy, David, and Brunel, Lionel C., ‘Improving Perception to Make Distant Connections Closer’, Frontiers in Psychology 2 (2011), 385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, J.R., 1989. The Complete Problem Solver. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Huemer, Michael, Skepticism and the Veil of Perception (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2001).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Kvanvig, Jonathan L. and Riggs, Wayne D., ‘Can a Coherence Theory Appeal to Appearance States?’, Philosophical Studies 67 (1992), 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Jack, ‘Circularity, Reliability, and the Cognitive Penetrability of Perception’, Philosophical Issues, 21 (2011), 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, Fiona, ‘Cognitive Penetration of Colour Experience: Rethinking the Issue in Light of an Indirect Mechanism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 84 (2012), 24–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, David, Ethell, Susan, Donovan, Tim, and Crawford, Trevor, ‘How Do Radiologists Do It? The Influence of Experience and Training on Searching for Chest Nodules.’ Radiography 12 (2006), 134–42.10.1016/j.radi.2005.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markie, Peter J., ‘The Mystery of Direct Perceptual Justification’, Philosophical Studies 126 (2005), 347–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John, ‘Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge’, Proceedings of the British Academy 68 (1982), 455–79.Google Scholar
McGrath, Matthew, ‘Knowing What Things Look Like’, Philosophical Review 126 (2017), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, Sarah, ‘Moral Knowledge by Perception’, Philosophical Perspectives 18 (2004), 209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mole, Christopher, ‘Attention and Cognitive Penetration’, In The Cognitive Penetrability of Perception: New Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Zeimbekis, John and Raftopoulos, Athanassios, (Oxford: OUP, 2015, 218–37).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin, Warrant and Proper Function, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pylyshyn, Zenon W., ‘Is Vision Continuous with Cognition?: The Case for Cognitive Impenetrability of Visual Perception’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1999), 341–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ransom, Madeleine, ‘Attentional Weighting in Perceptual Learning’, Journal of Consciousness Studies 27 (2020).Google Scholar
Shen, Li, Margolies, Laurie R., Rothstein, Joseph H., Fluder, Eugene, McBride, Russell, and Sieh, Weiva. ‘Deep Learning to Improve Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammograph’, Nature: Scientific Reports, 9 (2019), 12495.Google Scholar
Siegel, Susanna, ‘Subject and Object in the Contents of Visual Experience’, Philosophical Review, 115 (2006), 355–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Susanna, The Contents of Visual Experience, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Siegel, Susanna, ‘Cognitive Penetrability and Perceptual Justification’ Noûs 46 (2012), 201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Susanna, The Rationality of Perception (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siewert, C.P., The Significance of Consciousness (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silins, Nicholas, ‘The Significance of High-Level Content’ Philosophical Studies 162 (2013), 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Dustin, ‘Cognitive Penetrability of Perception’ Philosophy Compass 8 (2013), 646–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Dustin, ‘Cognitive Penetration and the Perception of Art’, Dialectica 68 (2014), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Dustin, ‘Attention and the Cognitive Penetrability of Perception’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96 (2018), 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Dustin, ‘On Perceptual Expertise’, Mind & Language, mila.12270, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, James W., Curran, Tim, and Sheinberg, David L., ‘The Training and Transfer of Real-World Perceptual Expertise’, Psychological Science 16 (2005), 145–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tye, Michael, Ten Problems of Consciousness (MIT Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaassen, Bram M.K., ‘Basic Beliefs and the Perceptual Learning Problem: A Substantial Challenge for Moderate Foundationalism’, Episteme 13 (2016), 133–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, T, Náñez, J E, and Sasaki, Y, ‘Perceptual Learning without Perception’, Nature 413 (2001), 844–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, Yetta K., Folstein, J. R., and Gauthier, I., ‘Task-Irrelevant Perceptual Expertise’, Journal of Vision, 11 (2011), 3–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Wayne, ‘Shaking Up the Mind's Ground Floor: The Cognitive Penetration of Visual Attention’, Journal of Philosophy, 114 (2017), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeimbekis, John and Raftopoulos, Athanassios, eds. The Cognitive Penetrability of Perception: New Philosophical Perspectives. (USA: OUP, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar