Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:04:12.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethical Intuitionism II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

J. R. Lucas
J. R. Lucas
Affiliation:
Merton College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

South. So we have agreed to bury intuitionism. Well, I dare say it is right. But we ought to bury some of the grave-diggers too. Some of the things that Ross said are no doubt wrong, or at least misleading: but they are a lot less wrong than most of the things said since the war.

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 46 , Issue 175 , January 1971 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Strawson, P. F., ‘Ethical Intuitionism’, Philosophy, 24, 1949, p. 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; reprinted in Sellars, W. and Hospers, J., eds., Readings in Ethical Theory, New York, 1952, p. 258.Google Scholar

2 Ross, W. D., The Right and the Good, Oxford, 1930, pp. 40–41.Google Scholar

3 Nowell-Smith, P. H., Ethics, London, 1954, p. 38.Google Scholar

4 Gregory, R. L., Eye and Brain, London, 1966.Google Scholar

5 Prichard, H. A., ‘Does Moral Philosophy rest on a Mistake?’, Mind, 21, 1912, p. 28;Google Scholar reprinted in Prichard, H. A., Moral Obligation, Oxford, 1949, p. 8,Google Scholar and in Sellars, W. and Hospers, J., eds., Readings in Ethical Theory, New York, 1952, p. 155.Google Scholar

6 Nowell-Smith, P. H., Ethics, p. 39.Google Scholar

7 Hare, R. M., The Language of Morals, Oxford, 1952, Ch. 5, § 2, pp. 80–81.Google Scholar

8 Strawson, P. F., Philosophy, 1949, p. 26 (Sellars and Hospers, p. 253).Google Scholar

9 Cf. Nowell-Smith, P. H., Ethics, p. 48.Google Scholar

10 Strawson, P. F., op. cit., p. 27, p. 254.Google Scholar

11 Nowell-Smith, P. H., Ethics, p. 37.Google Scholar

12 e.g. by Pole, David, The Conditions of Rational Enquiry, London, 1961Google Scholar; by Polanyi, Michael, Personal Knowledge, London, 1958 and 1969Google Scholar; and by Lucas, J. R., ‘The Philosophy of the Reasonable Man’, Philosophical Quarterly, 13, 1963, pp. 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Phaedrus 263a.

14 Nowell-Smith, P. H., Ethics, p. 46.Google Scholar

15 P. F. Strawson, pp. 27–8 (pp. 254–5).

16 Popper, K. R., ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Probability’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, X, 1959/1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mellor, D. H., ‘Chance’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Sup., Vol. XLIII, 1969Google Scholar; Lucas, J. R., The Concept of Probability, Oxford, 1970.Google Scholar

17 Hart, H. L. A., ‘The ascription of Responsibilities and Rights’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, XLIX, 1948–1949, pp. 171–94;Google Scholar reprinted in Flew, A. G. N., ed., Logic and Language, Series I, Oxford, 1951, pp. 145–66.Google Scholar

18 P. 30 n; pp. 256–7, n. 5.

19 Ross, W. D., The Right and the Good, pp. 40–1.Google Scholar

20 Ross, W. D., The Right and the Good, pp. 40–1.Google Scholar

21 pp. W. D. Ross, 30–1.

22 p. 29.

23 Nowell-Smith, P. H., Ethics, pp. 46–7.Google Scholar

24 Lucas, J. R., ‘On Not Worshipping Facts’, Philosophical Quarterly, 8, 1958, pp. 147–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Phaedo 63e.