Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-n7lw4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-06T16:29:05.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘Empty Mind’ of Professor Canfield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Chris Gudmunsen
Chris Gudmunsen
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 52 , Issue 202 , October 1977 , pp. 482 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Canfield, John V., ‘Wittgenstein and Zen’, Philosophy 50, No. 194 (10 1975), 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 I cannot argue this properly here, but I have done so in Wittgenstein and Buddhism (London: Macmillan, 1977).Google Scholar

3 The subject of ‘neither existence nor non-existence’ in Wittgenstein and Mādhyamika Buddhism was touched on in Gudmunsen, C., ‘on the Mahāyāna and Wittgenstein’, Religion 4/2 (Autumn 1974), 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar