Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:15:52.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Criticizing Forms of Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

W. W. Sharrock  and
R. J. Anderson
W. W. Sharrock
Affiliation:
University of Manchester and Manchester Polytechnic
R. J. Anderson
Affiliation:
University of Manchester and Manchester Polytechnic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 60 , Issue 233 , July 1985 , pp. 394 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hinman, Lawrence M., ‘Can a Form of Life Be Wrong?’, Philosophy 58 (1983), 339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 We use ‘ways of life’ in preference to ‘forms of life’ because we are far from sure that Wittgenstein's use of that expression was meant to refer to social institutions and cultural practices. We are sure that there are reasons for interpreting it otherwise. See, for example, Beehler, Rodger, Moral Life (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978), 93Google Scholar.

3 Winch, Peter, ‘Understanding a Primitive Society’ in his Ethics and Action (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972), 15Google Scholar.

4 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Basil Black-well, 1953), 240, see also 241Google Scholar.

5 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1966)Google Scholar.

6 Ibid., 53.

7 Ibid.

8 Ibid., 56.

9 Ibid.

10 Ludwig Wittgenstein, ‘Remarks on Frazer's “The Golden Bough”’ in Luckhardt, C. G., Wittgenstein: Sources and Perspectives (Brighton: Harvester, 1979), 61–81Google Scholar.

11 Winch, Peter, The Idea of a Social Science, (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958)Google Scholar.

12 Wittgenstein, , On Certainty (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969), 608–609Google Scholar.

13 We are grateful to Ilham Dilman for his helpful comments on an earlier draft.