Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:01:12.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Case for Pacifism and Conscientious Objection: A Reply to Professor G. C. Field. By Rev.E. L. Allen, Francis E. Pollard, and G. A. Sutherland. (London: Central Board for Conscientious Objectors. 1946. No price given.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
New Books
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 277 note 1 But is it relevant to illustrate from our approval of “the man who is truthful even when it would be distinctly to his advantage to be otherwise?” (Italics mine.).

page 278 note 1 A reviewer must protest against Mr. Sutherland's central comment on conscription. “When men are forced to fight it cannot be held that they are fighting because they think it right; the reason they are fighting is because they are submitting to force majeure. & They may believe the cause is just, but that is not why they are fighting; they are fighting because the only alternative is heavy legal penalties. & Failure to accept this implies a belief that every German soldier is fighting in what is to him a just cause.”—That is, with motives A and B both in the field, everyone concerned acts solely from B; and failure to accept this implies a belief that they all act from A.