Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:01:46.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Bearing of Ethics on Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Extract

Ethics and psychology are apt to look askance at one another. The ethicist warns the psychologist that he cannot “ explain away ” the objective distinction between good and evil merely by describing the process by which we come to apprehend that distinction. Nor can he in any such manner show that moral obligation is illusory. On the other hand, some psychologists do claim that in exposing the psychological sources of moral experience they show that no objective distinction is involved in it.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 368 note 1 By “ conation ” I mean conscious striving. For there cannot be striving which is not a case of awareness. I use the word “ conation,” rather than the word “ desire,” to cover cases in which, though the goal is not envisaged, there is acquiescence in, or resistance of, tendencies in operation.

page 369 note 1 The Analysis of the Mind, Ch. III.

page 369 note 2 The Mind and its Place in Nature, p. 370 ff.

page 373 note 1 We might tentatively define the “person” as that system of needs which the organism has in consequence of its capacity for psychical activity. And since this activity occurs in a social environment, one of the chief needs of the person is the need for respect, affection, triumph. This may be regarded as a psychical complication of the biological need for survival.