Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:08:42.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anselm's Neglected Argument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2002

Brian Leftow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anselm is commonly credited with two a priori arguments for God's existence, the non-modal argument of Proslogion 2 and a modal argument some find in Proslogion 3. But his Reply to Gaunilo contains a third. The argument as Anselm gives it has flaws, but they are not fatal, and its main premise can serve as the basis of a simpler, stronger argument.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , July 2002 , pp. 331 - 347
Copyright
© The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)