Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:33:10.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thinking And Machines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

H. R. T. Roberts
Affiliation:
Officers' Mess, Indian Air Force Station, Tambaram, South India.

Extract

Professors A. D. Ritchie (Philosophy, January 1957) and F. H. George (Philosophy, April 1957) both miss the question: What is the use of saying that machines think? Does the extension in the use of the word “think” to cover the complicated activity of modern machines (actual or possible in theory) enable us to explain better the nature of such activity? Extensions in usage are common and necessary in science.

Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 S. Toulmin, Philosophy of Science, p. 22.