Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:00:28.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should Blackmail be Banned?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

David Owens
David Owens
Affiliation:
Girton College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is no right to blackmail. So says the law and so say most moral observers. A few libertarian voices have been raised in defence of blackmail (e.g. Mack) but such a defence is liable to be treated as a reductio of the defender's own free market philosophy. However, it is surprisingly difficult to say just what is wrong with blackmail.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 63 , Issue 246 , October 1988 , pp. 501 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mack, E., ‘In Defense of Blackmail’, Philosophical Studies 41 (1982), 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Nozick, R., Anarchy, State and Utopia (Oxford: Blackwell, 1974), 84–87.Google Scholar

3 Scruton, R., Sexual Desire (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1986), 103–107.Google Scholar

4 I have benefited from the comments of Roger Teichmann, Brian Garrett and Peter Sandoe on earlier drafts of this paper.