^{page 187 note 1} Psychologie de Hume. Traité de la Nature humaine. Trad. Renouvier et Pillon. Préface par Pillon. P. lxviii.

^{page 187 note 2} Preface, Essai I (Logique), Tome I, p. xvi.

^{page 188 note 1} Renouvier's, remark in his note on the Kantian Categories. Logique I, p. 133 (Note B) to chap. xxvi.Google Scholar

^{page 192 note 1} On the many puzzling questions of Time, the reader may consult the writer's recent volume, The Problem of Time (Allen and Unwin Ltd.).

^{page 193 note 1} Cf. the very interesting remarks by Renouvier at the end of the first volume of his Psychologie rationnelle (1912 ed., pp. 369–93) on Lequier and philosophy; also the fragments reprinted by Renouvier in that work, “Comment trouver, comment chercher” (vol. i), on Subject and Object (vol. ii) and on Freedom.

^{page 195 note 1} Psychologie rationnelle, vol. i, p. 5.

^{page 196 note 1} Psychologie rationnelle, vol. ii, p. 78.

^{page 196 note 2} Ibid., vol. ii, p. 138.

^{page 197 note 1} Book X,Del’État actuel de la Philosophieen France.Chap. 1, “De l’Aboutissements des Esprits au Positivisme,” pp. 416–17.

^{page 197 note 2} Vol. ii, chap, xvii: “De la Certitude des Sciences et leur Classification rationnelle,” pp. 139–86, including later observations on Spencer.

^{page 198 note 1} Vol. i, pp. 107–15, and also vol. ii, pp. 202–45.

^{page 198 note 2} Logique, vol. ii, p. 321.Google Scholar

^{page 198 note 3} Note B to chap, xxxv of the Logique, vol. ii, p. 13.Google Scholar

^{page 198 note 4} For Cournot’s ideas and the parallel between his thought and that of Renouvier, see the writer’s book Modern French Philosophy.

^{page 198 note 5} This outburst of attack is a sample of Renouvier’s usual attitude to positivism. Deuxiéme Essai, vol. ii, pp. 166–70.Google Scholar

^{page 199 note 1} Logique, vol. ii, p. 352.