Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T17:18:03.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationship Between Conscious and Unconscious Intentionality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2021

Raamy Majeed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The contemporary view of the relationship between conscious and unconscious intentionality consists in two claims: (i) unconscious propositional attitudes represent the world the same way conscious ones do, and (ii) both sets of attitudes represent by having determinate propositional content. Crane (2017) has challenged both claims, proposing instead that unconscious propositional attitudes differ from conscious ones in being less determinate in nature. This paper aims to evaluate Crane's proposal. In particular, I make explicit and critique certain assumptions Crane makes in support of his asymmetry, and argue for a conditional claim: if Crane is right that unconscious intentional states are (relatively) indeterminate, this suggests that conscious intentional states are indeterminate in a similar fashion as well.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 97 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 169 - 185
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Philosophy.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Camp, Elisabeth, ‘Why Maps are Not Propositional’, in Grzankowski, Alex and Montague, Michelle (eds.), Non-Propositional Intentionality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Carruthers, Peter, Language, Thought, and Consciousness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, William, Causality, Interpretation, and the Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Crane, Tim, ‘Is Perception a Propositional Attitude?’ Philosophical Quarterly 59 (2009), 452–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Tim, ‘Unconscious Belief and Conscious Thought’. In Kriegel, Uriah (ed.), Phenomenal Intentionality, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013a) 156–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Tim, ‘The Given’. In Schear, Joseph K. (ed.), Mind, Reason and Being-in-the-World: the McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, (London: Routledge, 2013b) 229–49.Google Scholar
Crane, Tim, The Mechanical Mind: A Philosophical Introduction to Minds, Machines and Mental Representation (Third Edition) (London: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Crane, Tim, ‘The Unity of Unconsciousness’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 117 (2017), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Michael and Sterelny, Kim, Language and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald, ‘Radical Interpretation’. Dialectica 27 (1973), 314–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C., The Intentional Stance. (Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: MIT Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C., ‘Real Patterns’. Journal of Philosophy 88 (1991), 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A., The Language of Thought. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Strachey, James and Freud, Anna eds.), 24 vols. (London: The Hogarth Press, 1953–1964).Google Scholar
Gauker, Christopher, Thinking Out Loud: An Essay on the Relation Between Thought and Language (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzankowski, Alex, ‘Pictures Have Propositional Content’, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (2015), 151–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert, Thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Kriegel, Uriah, ‘The Phenomenal Intentionality Research Program’ in Kriegel, Uriah (ed.), Phenomenal Intentionality, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014) 1—27.Google Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca and Lance, Mark, ‘Speaking and Thinking’. In O'Shea, James R. (ed.), Sellars & his Legacy, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 81—99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, Edouard, ‘You Don't Know How You Think: Introspection and Language of Thought’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2005), 469–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitt, David, ‘The Phenomenology of Cognition or What Is It Like To Think That P?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2004), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Orman Quine, Willard, Word and Object (Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: MIT Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert, ‘A Puzzling Element in the Notion of Thinking’. Proceedings of the British Academy Vol. XLIV (1958). Reprinted in Strawson, P. F. (ed.) Studies in the Philosophy of Thought and Action (London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Searle, John R., The Rediscovery of the Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid, ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1 (1956), 253–329. Reprinted as Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, (Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Vicente, Augustín and Jorba, Marta, ‘The Linguistic Determination of Conscious Thought Contents’. Nous 53 (2019), 737–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, Richard, Freud (London: Fontana/Collins, 1971).Google Scholar