Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T03:57:48.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rational Explanation and Historical Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

K. E. Jones
K. E. Jones
Affiliation:
University of Kent at Canterbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 58 , Issue 226 , October 1983 , pp. 528 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The standard works are R. G. Collingwood, The Idea of History (London: Oxford University Press, 1961), particularly Part V, and W. H. Dray, Laws and Explanation in History (London: Oxford University Press, 1957). For a discussion of the ‘reactionists’, see M. Mandelbaum, ‘The Problem of “Covering Laws” ’, History and Theory 1 (1961), 229–242; reprinted in The Philosophy of History, P. Gardiner (ed.) (London: Oxford University Press, 1974), 51–65.

2 A detailed account occurs in R. Binion, ‘Repeat Performance: A Psychohistorical Study of Leopold III and Belgian Neutrality’, History and Theory 8 (1969), 213–259. An example of a more general account occurs in Alistair Home, To Lose a Battle (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1979), 72.

3 A. J. P. Taylor, English History 1914–1945 (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1970), 571–572.

4 John Watkins, ‘Imperfect Rationality’, Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences, R. Borger and F. Cioffi (eds) (London: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 211.

5 James Joll, ‘1914: The Unspoken Assumptions’, The Origins of the First World War, H. W. Koch (ed.) (London: Macmillan, 1972), 307–328.

6 Cf. Robert Skidelsky, ‘Lessons of Suez’, The Age of Affluence 1951–1964, V. Bogdanor and R. Skidelsky (eds) (London: Macmillan, 1970), 168–191.

7 K. Zilliacus, Mirror of the Past (New York: A. A. Wyn, Inc., 1946), 136–149. Reproduced in The Outbreak of the First World War, Dwight E. Lee (ed.) (Boston: D. C. Heath and Company, 1963), 45–51. The quotation is on p. 45, my italics.

8 Robert Blake, The Unknown Prime Minister (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1955). 285.

9 Cf. A. J. P. Taylor, The Struggle for Mastery in Europe 1848–1918 (London: Oxford University Press, 1971), 211, 217–218.

10 Alfred Cobban, A History of Modern France, Volume 2: 1799–1945 (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1961), 196.

11 R. F. Atkinson, Knowledge and Explanation in History (London: Macmillan, 1978), 139, my italics.

12 Cf. op. cit. note 3, 526–527.

13 Barbara W. Tuchman, The Proud Tower (London: H. Hamilton, 1966),xiv.

14 Cf., for example, ‘It was now [1940] that France needed a Gambetta or a Clemenceau and failed to find one’. J. P. T. Bury, France 1814–1940 (London: Methuen & Co. Ltd, 1969), 294.

15 As reported in Winston S. Churchill, The Second World War, Volume 3 (London: Cassell, 1964), 137–138. In 1918, there were sixty British divisions in the line.

16 K. R. Popper, The Open Society and its Enemies, Volume 2 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966), 251, my italics.