Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:47:51.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Popper Had a Brand New Bag

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

James M. Brown
James M. Brown
Affiliation:
New University of Ulster
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 59 , Issue 230 , October 1984 , pp. 512 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Stove, D. C., ‘How Popper's Philosophy Began’, Philosophy 57, No. 221 (July 1982), 386.Google Scholar

2 Op. cit. 381.

3 Ibid.

4 Popper, K. R., Conjectures and Refutations (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969), 36; quoted by Stove, ibid. Popper gave what is now Chapter I of Conjectures and Refutations as a lecture in 1953.Google Scholar

5 Stove, ibid.

6 Op. cit. 385.

7 Op. cit. 384.

8 Op. cit. 381.

9 The Concise Oxford Dictionary (Oxford University Press, 1975Google Scholar) says that ‘irrefutable’ means ‘not to be refuted’ and that ‘equivocate’ means ‘use ambiguous words to conceal the truth’ or ‘prevaricate’. The suggestion that Popper takes ‘irrefutable’ to mean simply ‘consistent with every observation statement’ would be hard to sustain; cf. Popper, K. R., The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson,1968), sections 9, 20 and 21.Google Scholar

10 Conjectures and Refutations, 35.

11 Ibid.

12 Op. cit. 37.